|
Post by Isadora Is a Door on Feb 4, 2016 3:22:45 GMT -5
gtfo you do not know the definition of rad The radness of an item is measured by opinions, and is not a stable scale. Something which is rad for a person might look horrible to others, so shut up and don't be so negative. I consider the book covers I posted above to be rad. The pictures I found don't do them justice anyway; you gotta see them IRL. yeah up yours bandit
|
|
|
Post by Tryina Denouement on Feb 4, 2016 5:14:21 GMT -5
you should learn to respect others' opinions bro
|
|
|
Post by Reba on Feb 4, 2016 8:50:10 GMT -5
but this was a "personal appeal for rad book covers" thread, not a "post salsaty book covers and don't you dare mention how salsaty they are because they mean a lot to me gosh" thread
|
|
|
Post by Tryina Denouement on Feb 4, 2016 10:04:14 GMT -5
it is a personal appeal for rad book covers. That means every person deserves to post a cover they consider to be cool. I don't really like the books, anyway, they're kind of salsa. For some consolation, can I post the book cover of an old Indonesian book? I think it looks rad, and I hope you agree this time, too.
|
|
|
Post by Reba on Feb 4, 2016 11:23:32 GMT -5
good job
|
|
|
Post by Hermes on Feb 4, 2016 16:04:23 GMT -5
I like all your covers, Tryina.
|
|
|
Post by B. on Feb 4, 2016 16:33:50 GMT -5
but this was a "personal appeal for rad book covers" thread, not a "post salsaty book covers and don't you dare mention how salsaty they are because they mean a lot to me gosh" thread This was also about posting covers with nice design aspects, without judging the content of the novels inside. I don't think it's a coincidence that you approve of the history book and look down on the YA covers. On topic, I like this cover: . I own the book and the writing on the front is all 3d and textured. Its eye-catching design was part of why I bought it in the first place.
|
|
|
Post by Reba on Feb 4, 2016 16:39:20 GMT -5
i don't think it's a coincidence that the bad covers were also YA. but that could be a horrible history book for all i know
|
|
|
Post by B. on Feb 4, 2016 16:40:54 GMT -5
i don't think it's a coincidence that the bad covers were also YA. but that could be a horrible history book for all i know Could you perhaps detail what it is you find so abhorrent about the covers Tryina posted then instead of whining about them like a 12 year old?
|
|
|
Post by penne on Feb 4, 2016 19:07:20 GMT -5
i don't love tryina's covers, but i love how eloquently she explained what she likes about them and how well she handled bandit's criticism. well done, tryina, you seem really mature!!
|
|
|
Post by Charlie on Feb 4, 2016 19:12:21 GMT -5
Tbh I think that whilst aesthetically pleasing they weren't rad in the sense Terry and Bsndit were using it
|
|
|
Post by Reba on Feb 4, 2016 19:31:27 GMT -5
damn bee sure hates 12 year olds. things that don't usually make for a rad book cover:
1. featuring a blurb 2. featuring a model photographed specifically for the cover 3. if said model is supposed to be a character 4. too many symbols in one graphic
|
|
|
Post by Reba on Feb 4, 2016 20:06:04 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 4, 2016 23:29:28 GMT -5
There is this book called Iceberg or something and it had a cool cover, I can't find it though.
|
|
|
Post by Cafe SalMONAlla on Feb 5, 2016 0:16:00 GMT -5
bear, radness is entirely a matter of opinion. And also not a word according to my spell check. Here's another one.
|
|