|
Post by Optimism is my Phil-osophy on Aug 27, 2020 3:15:41 GMT -5
Did the fire occur on the set of a play, or perhaps a movie? Yes, the fire occur on a set of a movie.
|
|
|
Post by Optimism is my Phil-osophy on Aug 27, 2020 3:16:25 GMT -5
Was the victim employed as an actor? Yes, the victim was an actor.
|
|
|
Post by R. on Aug 27, 2020 3:19:43 GMT -5
Was this one of Gustav Sebald’s movies?
|
|
|
Post by Optimism is my Phil-osophy on Aug 27, 2020 3:28:26 GMT -5
Was this one of Gustav Sebald’s movies? Yes, it was.
|
|
|
Post by Dante on Aug 27, 2020 7:45:46 GMT -5
Was it a canonical Gustav Sebald movie, and if so, was it Gorillas in the Fog, and if so, was the young man wearing a gorilla costume?
|
|
|
Post by Optimism is my Phil-osophy on Aug 27, 2020 8:30:22 GMT -5
Was it a canonical Gustav Sebald movie, and if so, was it Gorillas in the Fog, and if so, was the young man wearing a gorilla costume? Yes, it is a canonical film by Sebald, but the film had nothing to do with gorillas. (Hint: unfortunately. Because if the movie had been this one, the fire wouldn't have been so big).
|
|
|
Post by R. on Aug 27, 2020 8:44:32 GMT -5
Was the victim a canonical character?
Was the person who spoke the word a canonical character?
|
|
|
Post by Optimism is my Phil-osophy on Aug 27, 2020 9:24:58 GMT -5
Was the victim a canonical character? Was the person who spoke the word a canonical character? Neither the victim nor the person who spoke the wrong word are canonical characters.
|
|
|
Post by FileneNGottlin on Aug 27, 2020 9:35:21 GMT -5
Was the person who spoke the wrong word also an actor?
|
|
|
Post by Dante on Aug 27, 2020 9:41:37 GMT -5
Was the animal disguise intended for a role in the movie? Was it a title role? Would the disguise have been plausible outside the context of a movie?
Was the goal of the person who spoke the wrong word to destroy the movie set? Was the wrong word deliberately or accidentally spoken?
Was the fire set by a third person who heard the wrong word? Was the number of people present on the scene greater than three?
|
|
|
Post by Optimism is my Phil-osophy on Aug 27, 2020 12:50:43 GMT -5
Was the person who spoke the wrong word also an actor? Yes, the person who said the wrong word was an actor.
|
|
|
Post by Optimism is my Phil-osophy on Aug 27, 2020 13:04:50 GMT -5
Was the animal disguise intended for a role in the movie? Yes, the disguise of something like an animal was planned for this film. Yes, it was. No, it wouldn't. Yes, it was. You need to elaborate the question as something involving yes or no and let the master decide whether to tip or not. But I will make an exception here: the wrong word was said intentionally. No, It wasn't. No, it was not. The scene was an important monologue that could be seen as a profound character study.
|
|
|
Post by FileneNGottlin on Aug 27, 2020 13:28:15 GMT -5
Was the film Lions in the Mountains? By speaking the wrong word, was a secret code incorrectly received, or not received at all?
|
|
|
Post by Dante on Aug 27, 2020 14:29:19 GMT -5
You need to elaborate the question as something involving yes or no and let the master decide whether to tip or not. But I will make an exception here: the wrong word was said intentionally. My apologies; I've been trying to be careful about that, but you see how these things slip through when the question you're defining is a binary anyway. By the same token: By speaking the wrong word, was a secret code incorrectly received, or not received at all? Perhaps this might be better worded as "By speaking the wrong word, was a secret code not received at all?", with the "incorrectly received" interpretation being the necessary implication of an answer in the negative. We're fast running out of Gustav Sebald films featuring mammalian or quasi-mammalian creatures! I don't want to just go down the list, yes-or-no-ing every single one, but... Was the disguise that of a creature which really exists in our world?
|
|
|
Post by Optimism is my Phil-osophy on Aug 27, 2020 15:45:23 GMT -5
Was the film Lions in the Mountains? No, it wasn't. No. Attitudes were taken to ensure that the correct message was recorded and sent.
|
|