|
Post by Optimism is my Phil-osophy on Aug 27, 2020 15:49:43 GMT -5
Was the disguise that of a creature which really exists in our world? No, it was not.
|
|
|
Post by Dante on Aug 27, 2020 16:21:29 GMT -5
Was the disguise that of a creature which really exists in our world? No, it was not. Was the movie, then, Bigfoot in the Mall? Was the fire set within a very short time of the deadly word being spoken? Was the fire set by a person not associated with the production?
|
|
|
Post by Optimism is my Phil-osophy on Aug 27, 2020 17:09:27 GMT -5
Was the movie, then, Bigfoot in the Mall? No, it was not. Yes, about a week later. No, it wasn't. The fire was caused by someone who was associated with the film's production.
|
|
|
Post by Dante on Aug 28, 2020 2:38:56 GMT -5
Was the movie, then, Bigfoot in the Mall? No, it was not. I'm surprised; given what we learned earlier about the size of the set, I thought that seemed the most likely - ah, but in retrospect, I had forgotten that the set only resembled a rural area, rather than necessarily being constructed in same. Werewolves in the Rain, then? Or am I on the wrong track? (Yes, I am submitting both of those questions.) That's actually more what I had in mind for a longer term, but so long as we have an answer! But it nonetheless took a week, even though the one responsible for the fire was already there. Curious. Was one week how long it took for the message to be received?
|
|
|
Post by Optimism is my Phil-osophy on Aug 28, 2020 2:55:57 GMT -5
Werewolves in the Rain, then? Yes, it was. No, you are on the right track. No. The message was only received after the movie was released in theaters.
|
|
|
Post by Dante on Aug 28, 2020 3:53:23 GMT -5
Werewolves in the Rain, then? Yes, it was. Hmm. I'm curious as to why Gorillas in the Fog would have resulted in a smaller fire. A rain-themed movie seems like it would have better fire-defence properties, and I'm not sure why either would have had a larger or smaller set than the other. Was the victim playing a werewolf? Were there multiple actors portraying werewolves? Does it matter if there were multiple actors portraying werewolves? Does it matter to the mystery that the movie was specifically Werewolves in the Rain? Was the victim playing a werewolf? Were there multiple actors portraying werewolves? Does it matter if there were multiple actors portraying werewolves? The message was received after the movie hit theatres, the fire was set after one week by somebody associated with the production. Time to sort out the sequence of events - did it take longer than one week for the movie to hit theatres? Was the wrong word heard by at least one person on set as it was spoken? Was the fire set by somebody other than the person who spoke the wrong word and the victim? Were the victim and the person who spoke the wrong word the same individual?
|
|
|
Post by Optimism is my Phil-osophy on Aug 28, 2020 4:06:50 GMT -5
Was the victim playing a werewolf? Yes, he was. Yes, but they were part of the film's production for a long time, and played less important roles. It doesn't really matter that much. Yes, because if it were another film, the fire might have been smaller because the fire would be quickly extinguished, and there would probably be no victims. Yes for sure. After recording it is still necessary to have time for editing. In this case, the editing work was especially necessary. Yes, everyone on the recording set heard that, especially the director. No, only one of these two people is responsible for the fire. No, they are different from each other.
|
|
|
Post by R. on Aug 28, 2020 4:34:26 GMT -5
Did the victim set the fire then?
|
|
|
Post by Optimism is my Phil-osophy on Aug 28, 2020 4:52:48 GMT -5
Did the victim set the fire then? No, it was not the victim who set fire.
|
|
|
Post by R. on Aug 28, 2020 4:54:06 GMT -5
So, the person who spoke the wrong word set the fire?
|
|
|
Post by Optimism is my Phil-osophy on Aug 28, 2020 5:06:42 GMT -5
So, the person who spoke the wrong word set the fire? Yes, he did.
|
|
|
Post by R. on Aug 28, 2020 7:14:06 GMT -5
Was the person who spoke the wrong word trying to prevent the film’s production?
|
|
|
Post by Optimism is my Phil-osophy on Aug 28, 2020 7:30:54 GMT -5
Was the person who spoke the wrong word trying to prevent the film’s production? Yes, that was his intention when he set fire to the film set.
|
|
|
Post by Dante on Aug 28, 2020 7:48:11 GMT -5
But the movie nonetheless reached theaters? Was the word spoken at the wrong time wrong in the sense that it deviated from the script? Did it affect an intended Sebald Code message? Was the error noticed and corrected at the time? Was the person who spoke wrongly an enemy of V.F.D.? Was the victim on-set specifically at the time of the fire as part of a V.F.D. operation?
|
|
|
Post by R. on Aug 28, 2020 7:48:58 GMT -5
Was the person who spoke the wrong word female?
|
|