|
Post by Kit's tits kick ticks on Dec 17, 2012 9:52:35 GMT -5
Maybe monthly? I'd like that. monthly sounds great! Tragedy was Pandora? That's a strange idea. No Tryina, that wasn't you.
|
|
|
Post by Tryina Denouement on Dec 17, 2012 10:34:15 GMT -5
No Tryina, that wasn't you. Oh at that time I was busy watching PL cheats.... but I'm only late a little.
|
|
|
Post by Hermes on Dec 17, 2012 10:53:20 GMT -5
Hold on - was Tragedy posting as Pandora? I heard that at one point Pandora was posting as Tragedy: but all the time I was there Pandora seemed very much to be her real self.
I have no idea who 'Tryina' was.
|
|
|
Post by Tryina Denouement on Dec 17, 2012 10:55:15 GMT -5
I have no idea who 'Tryina' was. I also have no idea!
|
|
|
Post by penne on Dec 17, 2012 11:48:40 GMT -5
Willis told us that Pandora actually never joined the chat. Tragedy was pretending to be Pandora to get out of his marriage and then I think Willis started to pretend he was Pandora after Tragedy left.
|
|
|
Post by Hermes on Dec 17, 2012 14:16:10 GMT -5
If that's so he's a very good actor. And besides, it wasn't Pandora who first brought up the question of the marriage.
If it was Tragedy, I hope I didn't say anything too injudicious.
*Packs bags, prepares to leave.*
|
|
|
Post by Kit's tits kick ticks on Dec 17, 2012 14:26:37 GMT -5
If it was Tragedy, I hope I didn't say anything too injudicious. I think you didn't. But I wonder if I did. And I really want to know who Tryina was! There are two possibilities, or maybe three if he or she lied about being there for the first time. Edit: If he or she lied about the MOTM thing it could be almost everyone...
|
|
|
Post by Christmas Chief on Dec 17, 2012 15:30:00 GMT -5
Tragedy, were you Pandora? I've been examining the evidence, and concluded that if Pandora was in fact Tragedy, his impression was indeed quite accurate. Although we could always PM Pandora and ask. (To be clear: A member entered the chatroom under a dubious screen name, then revealed her/himself as Pandora (that was when Hermes was still with us). Later Willis claimed this individual was in fact Tragedy attempting to disengage himself from his wedding, and later Willis continuing the charade. It is unclear who is lying.) Also inconclusive, though I have a suspicion. Nowhere else on the internet, apparently. I keep forgetting the correct acronym is "brb;" "wrm" is much easier for me to remember. Furthermore: Since there appears to be widespread interest, I suppose we can give this another go in January. I'll organize something when the time gets closer.
|
|
|
Post by penne on Dec 17, 2012 15:59:16 GMT -5
Another clue that Pandora was in fact Tragedy: If she was in fact so passionate about ending the engagement, why wouldn't she create the damn thread, even with Willis' permission?
|
|
|
Post by Hermedy on Dec 17, 2012 15:59:44 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Christmas Chief on Dec 17, 2012 16:02:32 GMT -5
Were you Pandora, Tragedy? Use one for yes and two for no.
|
|
|
Post by Hermedy on Dec 17, 2012 16:06:46 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Kit's tits kick ticks on Dec 17, 2012 16:14:28 GMT -5
I knew that he would use 3!
|
|
|
Post by bryan on Dec 17, 2012 16:17:40 GMT -5
What are you all talking about.
|
|
|
Post by Hermes on Dec 17, 2012 17:08:14 GMT -5
Another clue that Pandora was in fact Tragedy: If she was in fact so passionate about ending the engagement, why wouldn't she create the damn thread, even with Willis' permission? But if she was Tragedy, and was doing it to end the engagement, the same problem would arise. It may just be that after discussing the matter with Willis she thought better of it.
|
|