|
|
Post by Brian on Sept 20, 2005 17:20:19 GMT -5
Well, nina was very insulting and closed-minded on the disturbing discussion board, but I don't think she truly meant any harm. I don't particularly like her, but I don't see the need to ban her. As for the two actually in ~question~ [  ], I don't really see the need for either to leave either. I'm not voting. |
|
|
|
Post by s on Sept 20, 2005 17:23:34 GMT -5
Wait a minute...why exactly are we banning one of these people?
|
|
|
|
Post by Brian on Sept 20, 2005 17:25:39 GMT -5
Good point. Tragedy, could you tell us what offenses these people have committed to deserve this loooowly fate?
|
|
|
|
Post by raoawr on Sept 21, 2005 12:52:29 GMT -5
J for making a frolicking in the fields in the shower thread, Mr. Who because Trag doesn't like him.
|
|
|
|
Post by idiotj on Sept 21, 2005 14:13:38 GMT -5
frolicking in the fields threads have been allowed in the past. I was under the impression that my thread was not breaking any decrees.
|
|
|
|
Post by raoawr on Sept 21, 2005 14:16:37 GMT -5
So was I.
|
|
|
|
Post by lampy on Sept 21, 2005 14:19:46 GMT -5
Why should nina be banned? Sure, she writes like a really cool member, but I like her. I'm probably the only one, though. Uh, I have no more comments. [glow=red,2,300][shadow=blue,left,300]yes I think you are the only one  but thats cool you are my friend now ;D[/shadow][/glow] |
|
|
|
Post by Charles Vane on Sept 21, 2005 14:36:40 GMT -5
Trag should be banned because he is aware of how confusing it is when he says "Mos' Def".
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 21, 2005 18:29:38 GMT -5
this is terrible, but J
|
|
|
|
Post by Hermedy on Sept 22, 2005 4:42:24 GMT -5
13-17? This is too close.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 22, 2005 16:55:45 GMT -5
13-17? This is too close. who do you think should have most of the votes? |
|
|
|
Post by idiotj on Sept 22, 2005 17:46:25 GMT -5
General rule: Whatever hatramroany dictates, the opposite should be done |
|
|
|
Post by Black Bert on Sept 22, 2005 18:04:18 GMT -5
She's got a point.
Bye, Who-dogg.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 22, 2005 18:26:30 GMT -5
General rule: Whatever hatramroany dictates, the opposite should be done I voted for J cause they had less votes. I am assuming your old and not new-sorry I don't know people that well. She's got a point. Bye, Who-dogg. If you are reffering to me I'm a he, but it's ok cause it's a common mistake......for some reason |
|
|
|
Post by PJ on Sept 22, 2005 18:28:55 GMT -5
She's got a point. Bye, Who-dogg. If you are reffering to me I'm a he, but it's ok cause it's a common mistake......for some reason No, he's reffering to J. She's the one who said something for him to take a stance to, remember? |
|
], I don't really see the need for either to leave either. I'm not voting.
