|
Post by Charlie on Apr 18, 2017 9:22:15 GMT -5
I stand by my usage of obfuscation, as I reckon the purest mathematical constant to use would represent this 6.28... number and usage of other constants is less useful and sensible.
I would love for someone wiser and more learned than the both of us to correct me though, if I have used it wrongly. I'm still embarrassed I used mollify completely idiotically the other day -_-
Expanding would be practical in that a. If the new constant were to be adopted it'd end up being standardised to the general form for that type of formula b. All other usages of pi (circumference formula, radian measure, sine/cosine/tangent waves etc.) are based on 2pi, so usage of 2pi rather than pi would be neater for those cases as well
|
|
|
Post by bear on Apr 18, 2017 9:28:35 GMT -5
i fell asleep reading your post so i'll concede the point
|
|
|
Post by Charlie on Apr 18, 2017 10:04:45 GMT -5
I'll take that!
|
|
|
Post by B. on Apr 18, 2017 12:25:13 GMT -5
Well done Charlie
|
|
|
Post by M David Steel on Apr 18, 2017 13:37:00 GMT -5
well if i cant eat it it doesnt appeal to me
|
|
|
Post by Charlie on Apr 18, 2017 18:12:04 GMT -5
I've never been prouder :')
|
|