|
Post by SnicketFires on Nov 14, 2003 19:36:30 GMT -5
eye ya yi... have to get my book back...
|
|
|
Post by jack2004 on Nov 16, 2003 11:21:51 GMT -5
quigley survives the fire?
|
|
|
Post by SnicketFires on Nov 17, 2003 22:27:04 GMT -5
*teases* which fire
|
|
|
Post by The Amazing...Spider-Man! on Nov 20, 2003 11:35:25 GMT -5
somebody reply to this topic in getting bored here
|
|
|
Post by CountOlaf on Nov 20, 2003 13:56:45 GMT -5
ok, REPLY!!
|
|
|
Post by SnicketFires on Nov 20, 2003 19:53:00 GMT -5
REPLY
ok, as you wish.
The hotel denemount. discuss that.
|
|
|
Post by Ambidextrous Kevin on Nov 23, 2003 14:48:07 GMT -5
yes, quigley did survive. but we arent a hundred percent sure that a baud parent didnt survive now are we?....
|
|
|
Post by The Amazing...Spider-Man! on Nov 24, 2003 11:27:57 GMT -5
yeah anyone can survive a fire if they are lucky or are in another place
|
|
|
Post by SnicketFires on Nov 25, 2003 11:06:21 GMT -5
good point...
but would it be considered "surviving" if the person wasn't even there at the time?
|
|
|
Post by lemonysinlaw on Nov 25, 2003 18:25:56 GMT -5
Yes...........but since when have any of the Baudelaires been lucky??!
|
|
|
Post by SnicketFires on Nov 25, 2003 20:02:42 GMT -5
when violet burnt the toast. thats all i cant think of when before series... during the series umm... calargi carnival...used fire in TWW (boat)...THH... but in none of them they were believed to be dead...
also, does anyone know what the dailey punctilio printed on the baud fire? did they say anything about the kids surviving? they could have "suvived" that way
|
|
|
Post by Ambidextrous Kevin on Nov 30, 2003 17:00:47 GMT -5
hmmmmm.....in TSS, on page 366, Lemony Snicket says "the grown men in the baudelaires lives who were dead, such as JACQUES SNICKET, or the CHILDRENS FATHER, would NEVER WALK AGAIN."
so in conclusion,
if any parent is alive, then it has to be the bauds mom.
|
|
|
Post by SnicketFires on Nov 30, 2003 20:52:29 GMT -5
its says "the childrens father" it doesn't say which trio of kids.
*also i just noticed that jacques snicket could be important, in that phrase. If the bauds had known him for only a night, wouldn't that be a short time to think of him as a man in their lives? it could have been easily replaced with "uncle monty" or "hector" or "jerome" all of which they knew for longer. DH could have expected us to jump at the "childrens father" thing, so the jacques thing would go unnoticed. .
|
|
Luigi
Bewildered Beginner
Posts: 0
Likes: 2
|
Post by Luigi on Nov 30, 2003 20:57:15 GMT -5
Er..."Jacques" could not be replaced with "Hector" or "Jerome" because they are not dead...
|
|
|
Post by Ambidextrous Kevin on Nov 30, 2003 22:48:31 GMT -5
ummmm....no snicketfires, if u look back at my quote it says all the grown men in the BAUDELAIRES lives. it does specify BAUDELAIRES. so
|
|