|
Post by Trikip on Oct 1, 2009 15:29:37 GMT -5
We should do this at the end of the year.
|
|
|
Post by Hermedy on Oct 1, 2009 15:55:20 GMT -5
Or we could do it at the end of shut up.
|
|
|
Post by Sixteen on Oct 1, 2009 15:55:49 GMT -5
SLAAAAAAAM.
|
|
|
Post by Songbird on Oct 1, 2009 17:25:17 GMT -5
Um, we can't do that, because MotM has only been in existence for 5 years (as of 2010)
|
|
|
Post by Hermedy on Oct 1, 2009 18:18:03 GMT -5
SLAAAAAAAM.
|
|
|
Post by Triangle Eyes on Oct 1, 2009 18:25:46 GMT -5
Fun Fact: The decade actually ends on December 31, 2010, because there was no year zero. Likewise, the last millennium ended on December 31, 2000.
|
|
|
Post by Hermes on Oct 2, 2009 12:47:46 GMT -5
I agree with you, TE. But millions don't - I doubt we could convince them.
|
|
|
Post by Trikip on Oct 2, 2009 15:51:01 GMT -5
Um, we can't do that, because MotM has only been in existence for 5 years (as of 2010) Uh... yeah so what?
|
|
|
Post by Oolaf on Oct 2, 2009 15:52:04 GMT -5
SLAAAAAAAM.
|
|
|
Post by BSam on Oct 2, 2009 16:42:08 GMT -5
i think we should do this, but not til Jun 23, 2012
when the forum has been around for a decade
|
|
|
Post by jemima on Oct 3, 2009 11:12:04 GMT -5
BSam has made the most sense so far.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 3, 2009 14:07:54 GMT -5
I legit think its a good idea. Yeah, the decade technically goes another year, but its like celebrating the 80s or the 90s, except its the 00s. Yeah, 667 hasn't been around for 10 years but who cares. If anybody but trikip thought it up, it wouldn't have gotten any arguments.
|
|
|
Post by Trikip on Oct 3, 2009 14:48:02 GMT -5
SLAAAAAAAM.
|
|
|
Post by beatrice123 on Oct 3, 2009 16:07:05 GMT -5
I agree you guys.
|
|
|
Post by BSam on Oct 3, 2009 23:17:05 GMT -5
How? We are all making contradictory points.
|
|