|
Post by twigz on Jan 19, 2021 5:19:48 GMT -5
These quotes lead me to suspicion "I am not paid here, although I am supposed to some into a great deal of money in the future." Limeny answers as if they are one of the villians
"Wherever the driver of the car takes me — I’m nestled among an unpleasant person’s detritus in the trunk of a car. misstastrophe , will you be joining me and baudelaiire?" Limeny answers as if they were one of the children in the trunk.
"trying to save has been attached to a heavy object, and that door is the only one big enough to push the object through."
I believe is the passage that JL is referring to as incorrect.
|
|
|
Post by Optimism is my Phil-osophy on Jan 19, 2021 6:47:43 GMT -5
After Question Time: At the end of 13 days, if there is no early victory, I will post a poll. The most voted will be considered the accused of being a spy. (I ask that only those who are playing participate in the vote. In the event of a tie, the spy will have won automatically). There will be 2 days for you to vote. During these two days, you can deliberate as you wish. Be careful with the information you give during that time of consideration. The spy can try to guess where everyone is at any time. You can accuse making accusatory arguments also at this stage of the game. If after 2 days the number of votes is lower than the number of participants, the poll will be open for another day, in which I will invite anyone who wishes (with the exception of the master himself) to vote, including people who have not participated in the game. Then, the result will be given according to the final vote.
If the real spy is the most voted, all friends have won, and receive 2 points. In any other case, the spy wins and receives 2 points. I want to remember that rule. If we reach 6 votes during the first two days, we can end the round. I want to explain that I already voted. And I also want to make it clear that I fully agree with the argument presented. There are only two votes left, and if we have one more vote for someone other than Baudelaiire, we could say that we will have an accused person who will certainly have a majority of the votes. Edit: I just realized that this is not true. The legislator requires a minimum of two days of waiting, as people can change their votes during that time.
|
|
|
Post by Optimism is my Phil-osophy on Jan 19, 2021 11:34:49 GMT -5
We arrived in 6 votes. I'm looking forward to the end of the round. I just feel uncomfortable that the real spy hasn't tried to guess where we are. This is a smarter attitude.
|
|
|
Post by Optimism is my Phil-osophy on Jan 19, 2021 11:36:48 GMT -5
the panopticountolaf if you are the spy, end our sufferings, and make an attempt to guess the site where we are ... please ...
|
|
|
Post by the panopticountolaf on Jan 19, 2021 11:45:03 GMT -5
I’m afraid I must inform you of an extremely unfortunate event... I am not the spy. I blame myself — I was too conservative in my answers to make my true identity known.
Of course, this leaves the question: who was the spy? Will the real spy please stand up?
|
|
|
Post by Optimism is my Phil-osophy on Jan 19, 2021 12:03:26 GMT -5
So explain yourself better ... Who are you, really? I think it's okay to reveal our identities, as long as we don't reveal where we are.
|
|
|
Post by the panopticountolaf on Jan 19, 2021 12:28:09 GMT -5
I was Klaus Baudelaire in disguise as Dr. Tocuna, hence the references to saving a dearly beloved person, receiving money in the future, and riding in the trunk of a car.
|
|
|
Post by Optimism is my Phil-osophy on Jan 19, 2021 12:37:33 GMT -5
Is anyone else here Klaus?
|
|
|
Post by Optimism is my Phil-osophy on Jan 19, 2021 12:48:25 GMT -5
I want to explain that I changed my vote. Now that everything is cleared up, unless another Klaus suddenly appears, I turn my sights back to my initial suspicion. (I am the master at changing my mind when strong evidence is presented). I can say that gothicarchiesfan is the real spy. I will show you why I believe this, even if it leads to defeat ... After all, we are already at a level that if we warn the wrong person, we will lose anyway. So ... GAF took on the role of Hal. This is an unfortunately very appropriate role for the place where we are. As I asked him questions, he needed to give more and more specific answers. Each answer seemed to be right on a quick read. But in compensation, I put some pitfalls in each of the questions. He seems to have dodged them all, however. But his deviation record was in each answer.
More than that. The spy did not reveal himself for one very important reason. The spy is not sure if he is in a wider location or a more specific location. GAF's responses indicate that he followed the safe path, and gave answers always referring to the broader location. When I forced him to be specific, he did not made mistakes. Note my questions: I didn't use the expression "in here" but I used the expression "inside here" several times. I am not an English expert, but I am sure to believe that the word "inside" highlights that the question I asked was about the specific location we are in. GAF is the spy and he have luke, and I hope he doesn't see my argument ...
In other words, he was very lucky to guess exactly where we are. And he still chose exactly the character that fits for that location. He got it so right, that if someone else was the spy, that person would have guessed quickly where we are. I ask you to check and understand exactly what I mean. GAF got it right when I asked him about the documents he claimed to be seeing inside. And I hope you all change your votes quickly.
|
|
|
Post by Optimism is my Phil-osophy on Jan 19, 2021 13:34:15 GMT -5
I want to note that there are 7 people voting, while there are only 6 players. A person who is not one of us voted during the first two days. The person in question must have voted for @urbanletteropener. So, I suggest the master of the round to disregard one of the votes for urbanletteropene. Totaling 6 votes. I suggest that the current score is 3 votes for GAF, 1 for Baudelaiire and 2 for I want to note that there are 7 people voting, while there are only 6 players. A person who is not one of us voted during the first two days. The person in question must have voted for @urbanletteropener. So, I suggest the master of the round to disregard one of the votes for urbanletteropene. It will get easier, however, if the person who voted simply removed their vote. Christmas Chief, did you happen to be? I saw you here ...
|
|
|
Post by misstastrophe on Jan 19, 2021 13:39:37 GMT -5
so sorry all! the extra vote may have been me.* i've had some internet troubles lately. i'll see if i can go in & cancel it out. again, my apologies!
*edit: while not logged in, so it may have voted as a guest. anyone know how i can remove that?
|
|
|
Post by Optimism is my Phil-osophy on Jan 19, 2021 13:44:48 GMT -5
I don't know ... But could you tell us exactly who you voted for?
|
|
|
Post by misstastrophe on Jan 19, 2021 13:46:42 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Optimism is my Phil-osophy on Jan 19, 2021 14:03:46 GMT -5
I want to take advantage and confirm how GAF in fact must be the spy. Roxy is completely cleared, and I think I am, too. Of course I am known for being eccentric, but even I would not act against a certain victory. Baudelaiire used accusatory arguments against urbanletteropener. This does not clear her, but it would be very unusual behavior for a spy. Either she is a criminal genius, or she is simply innocent. The simplest answers are generally correct.
misstastrophe admittedly changed her vote. In the same way, this would be atypical behavior for the spy, especially if she already had the certain victory.
The urbanletteropener explanation convinced me. So the only suspect left is GAF. The two votes that urbanletteropener are certainly from GAF and another unknown person. I hope that person understands my argument. urbanletteropener
|
|
|
Post by Optimism is my Phil-osophy on Jan 20, 2021 16:25:22 GMT -5
The poll is locked. We await the master's speech.
|
|