|
|
Post by Quigley on Feb 8, 2004 21:50:24 GMT -5
It's a nice theory, but not plausible...It just doesn't work. Voldemort for sure would have heard of Crouch Jr.'s defeat; he knows everything. I think there are still people at Hogwarts, somehow, watching Harry and them. But from what I have experience with, JK usually does the totally unexpected.
|
|
|
|
Post by trish on Feb 9, 2004 12:12:00 GMT -5
*shifty eyes*
Who do you think at Hogwarts is a spy for Voldemort?
|
|
|
|
Post by negativenine on Feb 9, 2004 20:08:23 GMT -5
Well, some slytherin kids and their parents (ie: Draco and Lucius), maybe Dumbledore, maybe some ministry members. Maybe... *gaps* HERMIONE! OMG! it is liek so totaly hermion!
But I think JK has used the Polyjuice thing one too many times, I don't think she'd use it for Snape, again, after all of the rest of them. Plus, there are just too many holes in the theory.
The Dumbledore is evil theory is simply a theory that Dumbledore is evil... they base it on a lot of things which could just be coincidence, and a few things that are unexplained in the books so far (ie Dumbledore's glint of triumph when he hears that Voldemort used Harry's blood to ressurrect himself). If you check the Lexicon, I'm sure there's a couple huge pages about it. I don't believe it myself, so I couldn't give you a good rant/explanation about it. Sorry.
|
|
|
|
Post by trish on Feb 9, 2004 21:07:13 GMT -5
I don't think Dumblydorr is evil. Too many people trust him. And he is cool.
|
|
|
|
Post by No One Mourns the Wicked on Feb 9, 2004 22:45:11 GMT -5
I don't like Dumblydoor. He is sooo totally extremely evil. every villain is lemons evil. Yes, that evil.
|
|
|
|
Post by embah on Feb 10, 2004 2:39:11 GMT -5
I don't think dumbledore is evil. no way. He's too well liked for jkr to do something like that. everyone who reads harry potter will be so put off there'd be protests and complaints........well, maybe not that extreme. lol
But, I think that Percy Weasely is a spy for voldemort. He'd do anything for a bit of power after all. (he's demonstrated that already).
I go into another discussion forum sometimes to talk about harry potter, and this subject has been bought up numerous times. Alot of people on my board say that percy is a spy, when others say it's someone like mad eye moody, but we all agree on one thing there, It's not dumbledore or snape (turning evil i mean).
And they all give very good....and very long... explanations for their reasoning too, though I'm not going to type out every fact or theory. Anyway, my point is, that snape would be the obvious person to turn spy, and so would dumbledore, and we all know jkr, she's unexpecting and suspensful with her writing, so i doubt that she would write something as obvious as that. No, i think it won't be snape or dumbledore turning evil, it will be someone unexpected who, maybe, we haven't seen or heard of since the 1st or 2nd book. That's my reasoning anyway.
|
|
|
|
Post by trish on Feb 11, 2004 22:18:22 GMT -5
Like Professor Sinistra? I still have my suspicions about her.  Well, JKR relates herself to Dumbledore, and JKR isn't evil, so therefore I don't think Dumbledore is evil. Just my logic. |
|
|
|
Post by embah on Feb 13, 2004 1:46:23 GMT -5
Good logic. lol. She could be. But is Sinastra a girl or a boy? I can't remember her/his sex ever being mentioned before.
Wouldn't it be funny if one of the paintings were spying? It would add an interesting twist. Maybe the fat lady or the all famous (lol) Sir Cadogan is a spy?
|
|
|
|
Post by trish on Feb 20, 2004 23:03:53 GMT -5
Professor Sinistra is a girl. Member, she was dancing with the (imposter) professer Moody at the ball! Yup. A painting...Maybe...  |
|
|
|
Post by negativenine on Feb 20, 2004 23:40:46 GMT -5
But, I think that Percy Weasely is a spy for voldemort. He'd do anything for a bit of power after all. (he's demonstrated that already). I go into another discussion forum sometimes to talk about harry potter, and this subject has been bought up numerous times. Alot of people on my board say that percy is a spy, when others say it's someone like mad eye moody, but we all agree on one thing there, It's not dumbledore or snape (turning evil i mean). Well, I think Percy will become so "good" that he's bad. Like Barty Crouch did. You know... sending people to Azkaban without trial, dealing with DEs "firmly". He was one of Crouch's great admirers and it seems like he's too righteous to go do something like PURPOSEFULLY become a DE, or "evil" or whatever. I think if he has a transformation it'll have to be more gradual and sub-conscious. I just think that's the kind of person Percy is... And the painting thing isn't a huge stretch. After all, Sirius's mum (a painting) was controlling Kreacher as a spy, so it's not so hugely inbelievable for a painting at Hogwarts to be evil. But I expect that's the kind of thing Dumbledore would pick up on. Then again, he seems to like letting the bad guys have a go at Harry. Not sure why. Maybe that's support for Dumbledore being evil. Maybe support for him being crazy. Maybe support for me reading too much into things.  |
|
|
|
Post by embah on Feb 24, 2004 3:26:04 GMT -5
Oh yeah, I forgot about Prof. Sinastra dancing with the imposter moody.
I think that Percy is a spy, and has been for the past year, ever since he started working at the ministry.
I know the reason he was made assistant to the minister or whatever it was, was so he could be a spy for fudge, but what if voldemort or a deatheater helped in the persuasion, to make him that high up so he could spy for them, because then he could spy on the ministry goings-on's and also the weasley family and order.
|
|
