|
Love
Nov 28, 2003 11:55:57 GMT -5
Post by Vince Noir on Nov 28, 2003 11:55:57 GMT -5
When you have a crush, it feels like your in love. You feel all tingly and nervous.
Thats what i think any way.
Thankyou for reading!! Luv Phoebe
|
|
|
Love
Nov 29, 2003 22:47:22 GMT -5
Post by Melony K. Snicket on Nov 29, 2003 22:47:22 GMT -5
In my personal opinion, when you have a crush, before you have the crush, you think the person is hot. Also, you tend to not be able to talk to them. You can't look them in the eyes, and you look away when they look at you. Love(the romantic kind) on the other hand, you don't have to think they're hot. You can talk easily with the person, and can look them in the eye. You look back when they look at you.
|
|
|
Love
Dec 8, 2003 12:32:36 GMT -5
Post by katgrrl247 on Dec 8, 2003 12:32:36 GMT -5
Yeah... and a crush you needn't really know very well.
|
|
|
Love
Dec 15, 2003 18:13:53 GMT -5
Post by songbird11989 on Dec 15, 2003 18:13:53 GMT -5
[glow=red,2,300]i have had a lot of bad relationships and the difference between love and a crush is that when you have a crush on somebody, its only based on face value and not really on the person. love is when you couldn't imagine your life without the other person, like they are the oxygen you breathe. like no matter how many times you try to be mad at them you cant. its when that person is the only one that could make you stop crying, or make your heart beat faster and slower in the same instance. its when the anticipation of you seeing the other person makes you walk a little faster or feel a little crazy. its when you feel that everything is wrong in the world but the second that that one person is there to comfort you, all the pain and sorrow goes away. love is the greatest feeling in the whole world. [/glow]
|
|
|
Love
Dec 15, 2003 21:21:35 GMT -5
Post by Indistinguishable Blob on Dec 15, 2003 21:21:35 GMT -5
Hum...See, now, maybe I'm just the odd one (it's happened before) but not all crushes are on "hot"ness. (I hate that word, by the way...)
Like...Dave Grohl. I've got a notorious crush on Dave Grohl of the Foo Fighters (or, more to the point, used to.) , but I don't really think he's aesthetically pleasing. Personality. Actually, I've always though of crushes as more than finding someone attractive. I've seen lots of people who were attractive, but I don't usually get crushes on them. I acknowledge their pleasant facial features and don't really care much after that. A crush, however, means that I enjoy something else about them. Maybe it's their immense knowledge of roman history, or their talent in debating persuasively. Or they're funny and kind, ect, ect. If I have a crush on someone, their appearance changes anyway, because in your head, people's features change as you get to know them. That guy you thought was repulsive but had a wicked sense of humor will turn into some dashing prince before your eyes after you get to know him, just as that guy that was oh-so-"cute" will get noticably uglier after you see him taunting your best friend. "I don't know if you're beautiful because I love you too much..."-Asleep and Dreaming, Magnetic Fields. Close enough quote.
Love...heh. Love, I'm not sure I ever truely believed in for everyone, nor do I now. My perception of love is this grandoise, multi-colored thing...and very exaggerated. I think of a sort of "Stars exploding in the night", swirl of color and sound type thing... To condense, I think that true, actual love must be the most wonderful thing in the world. And, being the natural cynic I am, it only stands to reason that only a select few will be able to ever achieve this sort of love. The rest of us will be floundering about, jumping from love to love and thinking it's real...or I'm just cynical. "If you're lucky, you'll be one of the few to find somebody who can tolerate you..."-Go Home, BNL. Sorry. Couldn't resist throwing that in. And anyway, there are, as its' been pointed out before, many levels of love. I've always liked that theory more- the jump from "Crush" to "Love" seems to be a very wide one and there has to be something somewhere inbetween, no? Hum...as for what love-true love, that is ("Wuv...twu wuv...")- feels like...I have no idea. I guess the whole "spinning" thing again. Imfathomable happiness and such...
I really hope at least some of that made sense. I typed it in a hurry. And I do apologize for any and all spelling mistakes-I'm too lazy to bother.
|
|
|
Love
Dec 16, 2003 17:37:29 GMT -5
Post by songbird11989 on Dec 16, 2003 17:37:29 GMT -5
[glow=red,2,300]what i meant about being mad and stuff, like you try to be mad at them and ignore them or w/e and you can't help feeling sort of empty. i dont know its how i feel with my guy. [/glow]
|
|
|
Love
Dec 28, 2003 12:10:17 GMT -5
Post by xangelkimzx on Dec 28, 2003 12:10:17 GMT -5
i dunno, i don't think of love too much lol
|
|
|
Love
Jan 2, 2004 1:22:59 GMT -5
Post by Zeller on Jan 2, 2004 1:22:59 GMT -5
I don't like the idea of "just saying hello" in the first place. so no.
"love" is such an overused word, that it's lost a lot of meaning, if i ever saw any. I think it's very possible to fall on love at any age, at least in the way I loosely define the word. Love seems like it would be different for so many people. mostly based on their intellilgence. For some of the people i have met, I am fairly sure that love will only extend so far as " You're pretty. You kissed me. I think I love you," and for more intelligent people, or for anyone really that thinks about the topic more often, it becomes either a blurry mess that could only possibly be resolved by something i can't imagine (my case), or a concept. Again, I have almost no idea what i'm talking about. If you can think deeply, then you can love deeply (or shallowly).
|
|
|
Love
Jan 2, 2004 1:29:54 GMT -5
Post by Amphagorey on Jan 2, 2004 1:29:54 GMT -5
Love. Ahhhh, love. L'amoure. The Blender.(Thanks Matt Groening) Is is true that when you're in love, you just KNOW you're in love?
|
|
|
Love
Jan 2, 2004 13:30:31 GMT -5
Post by songbird11989 on Jan 2, 2004 13:30:31 GMT -5
[glow=red,2,300]i think so...[/glow]
|
|
|
Love
Jan 5, 2004 23:35:16 GMT -5
Post by Charles Vane on Jan 5, 2004 23:35:16 GMT -5
I think its possible to just know your going to fall in love with somebody but I don't think it happens very often. I have heard a few people see someone and just know they're going to end up married. I think deep down when you find someone you could be in love with for the rest of your life something clicks and a part of you knows wether you are aware of it or not. But then again what do I know? I have a pretty twisted verison of love from watching one to many soap operas.
|
|
|
Love
Jan 6, 2004 0:00:56 GMT -5
Post by negativenine on Jan 6, 2004 0:00:56 GMT -5
Okay, here's a question for you guys.
I have a friend who, approximately every 6 months, is "in love" with someone. Usually they don't know her very well (if at all, before she starts talking to them), she talks to them a few times, and then, after a couple conversations confesses her undying love. She gets rejected, feels terrible for another month or two, and then a while later starts the whole process again.
But when she's "in love" she doesn't stop talking or thinking about whoever it happens to be, and, being the passionate person she is, tends to obsess. She always ends up getting hurt in the end, and she never thinks over her actions, just goes up to people and tells them she's in love. And she's completely serious. There's no way to talk her out of doing something, tell her to take it slow, or suggest it may end up the same as all the other ones. Sometimes I really do believe she's in love, but I think she creates sort of a fake image of whoever it is: idealizes them, changes their image to near perfection...
So, first of all, is this love, or just infatuation? Is it possible to be "in love" with every one of them? Secondly, what on earth am I supposed to tell her? I'm running out of ideas and going crazy. I don't want to tell her that I don't think she's "in love" and that she should be patient, or point out what's happened every other time... but I hate seeing her get rejected and hurt and depressed every time....
|
|
|
Love
Jan 7, 2004 20:18:56 GMT -5
Post by MambaduMal on Jan 7, 2004 20:18:56 GMT -5
"Serial dater"... sounds kind of like a "serial killer" I guess that's pretty much all you CAN do, just be supportive and maybe try to lead her in another direction... but you never know, she may learn from too many bad experiences... good luck with it, Neggie I think I'm pretty confused about love right now... I think I really want to be in love again so I can sort some stuff out... figure out if there's something wrong with me... but I know it's dumb to WANT to be in love... it's something that's just supposed to happen...
|
|
|
Love
Jan 7, 2004 20:21:03 GMT -5
Post by songbird11989 on Jan 7, 2004 20:21:03 GMT -5
[glow=red,2,300]speaking of love valentines day is coming up in a little more than a month. [/glow]
|
|
|
Love
Jan 7, 2004 20:32:39 GMT -5
Post by Charles Vane on Jan 7, 2004 20:32:39 GMT -5
I agree with Swans.
I know how you feel Mamba I want to be in love again too. I guess it's kinda hard for me when I don't come into contact with guys on a regular basis but whatever.
Yeah I guess Valentines is next month. I have to spend it at a forensics competition.
|
|