Post by Ennui on Dec 3, 2004 8:34:10 GMT -5
I was just in the middle of a line of thought when an entirely new one occurred to me, scattering theorems to the winds.
Both the Duchess of Winnipeg and King of Arizona have bizarre titles...and indeed, taking it further, very possibly fake ones. Jacques suggests in his letter to Jerome (LSUA) that R is only disguised as a Duchess. This is also hinted at in the LSUA introduction.
In short, all this incriminates the King of Arizona as another VFDer, like the Duchess of Winnipeg. And I think that he may have subtly tried to simultaneously test and help the Baudelaires in TEE.
The Very Fancy Doilies trap was, to me on first reading, diabolically unexpected; a bolt from the blue. I gaped in amazement when the cardboard box was ripped open. I was sure the Baudelaires were about to triumph. But no. They, and I, had walked into a villainous plot hook, line, and sinker.
But-had the Baudelaires only been more observant, using prized VFD note-taking skills-it could have been avoided. For in the tedious and annoying list of In things that the King of Arizona recommended to Esme-along with magenta wallpaper and vacuum cleaners-were very fancy doilies. Cunningly slipped in, and not capitalised, so I for one missed them completely.
Could the King of Arizona deliberately have added this to the list, knowing that Esme would faithfully blurt it all out, a victime de la mode as ever, when she returned to 667 Dark Avenue, and hoping that the Baudelaires would notice it and avoid the impending disaster?
What do you think?
Both the Duchess of Winnipeg and King of Arizona have bizarre titles...and indeed, taking it further, very possibly fake ones. Jacques suggests in his letter to Jerome (LSUA) that R is only disguised as a Duchess. This is also hinted at in the LSUA introduction.
In short, all this incriminates the King of Arizona as another VFDer, like the Duchess of Winnipeg. And I think that he may have subtly tried to simultaneously test and help the Baudelaires in TEE.
The Very Fancy Doilies trap was, to me on first reading, diabolically unexpected; a bolt from the blue. I gaped in amazement when the cardboard box was ripped open. I was sure the Baudelaires were about to triumph. But no. They, and I, had walked into a villainous plot hook, line, and sinker.
But-had the Baudelaires only been more observant, using prized VFD note-taking skills-it could have been avoided. For in the tedious and annoying list of In things that the King of Arizona recommended to Esme-along with magenta wallpaper and vacuum cleaners-were very fancy doilies. Cunningly slipped in, and not capitalised, so I for one missed them completely.
Could the King of Arizona deliberately have added this to the list, knowing that Esme would faithfully blurt it all out, a victime de la mode as ever, when she returned to 667 Dark Avenue, and hoping that the Baudelaires would notice it and avoid the impending disaster?
What do you think?