|
Post by Brownie on Oct 18, 2006 19:52:59 GMT -5
Tri will do fine. The only problem is that Snicket Face was fired without even knowing. Which is wrong.
Was ADR only made admin. because she figured out the numbers thing? Talk about unfair. Seriously.
|
|
|
Post by Libitina on Oct 18, 2006 20:07:21 GMT -5
Ahh, Brownie, read the thread. It has been pretty well-established that SF has only been temporarily replaced. It only makes sense to have someone keep an eye on GGreetings in her absence.
And everybody really needs to calm down. Please. Keep the peace. Ommm.
|
|
|
Post by BSam on Oct 18, 2006 20:27:28 GMT -5
Was ADR only made admin. because she figured out the numbers thing? Talk about unfair. Seriously. you had a chance...
|
|
|
Post by All Due Respect on Oct 18, 2006 20:49:33 GMT -5
Yeah seriously Brownie. Dont let jealousy make you say something you'll regret
|
|
|
Post by Songbird on Oct 21, 2006 12:30:12 GMT -5
[glow=red,2,300]I have spoken with a classmate of SF (hooray for Myspace) and I just sent her what she should tell her. So hopefully I will have a response soon[/glow]
|
|
|
Post by Brownie Is Confuzzled. on Oct 23, 2006 18:01:49 GMT -5
Yeah seriously Brownie. Dont let jealousy make you say something you'll regret What did you do to my old account?
|
|
|
Post by SF on Oct 23, 2006 20:39:04 GMT -5
*cough* Um, Jem, what the bloody was 'unfair' about my appointment? Just thought I'd ask that. I think this is ALL ridiculously stupid. I asked months ago in the Mod section (which a lot of you are undeniably ignorant of what goes on in, so you should all keep you mouths shut) for a temporary mod to be put over my section, and it went by unnoticed for weeks, and went with no reply. Tragedy: Seeing as how I don't get to check up a lot, I was wondering if you would like to give someone a temporary moderator position over my section, until I get back. I ased the DDeleters to keep an eye on my section during my absence, but a temporary moderator might be more effective. This is of course if I can still keep my position in my absence
|
|
|
Post by Songbird on Oct 25, 2006 20:01:28 GMT -5
[glow=red,2,300]Yeah I noticed that only after I ranted about it for a bit but I corrected myself in the mod section, not here. oops[/glow]
|
|
|
Post by jemima on Oct 26, 2006 21:16:05 GMT -5
Snicket Face, I meant that it was unfair because it was like this... as in we didn't have an application thread for a new moderator. You just all of a sudden had the job. Even you didn't realize it for a minute.
|
|
|
Post by BSam on Oct 27, 2006 6:07:33 GMT -5
Snicket Face, I meant that it was unfair because it was like this... as in we didn't have an application thread for a new moderator. You just all of a sudden had the job. Even you didn't realize it for a minute. so she;s not as good as tragedy because she's doing the same thing as tragedy did
|
|
|
Post by SF on Oct 27, 2006 15:19:46 GMT -5
Snicket Face, I meant that it was unfair because it was like this... as in we didn't have an application thread for a new moderator. You just all of a sudden had the job. Even you didn't realize it for a minute. so she;s not as good as tragedy because she's doing the same thing as tragedy did That made absolutely no sense whatsoever. I suppose that it was a little impromptu, but no one really had a problem with me becoming a moderator. Obviously everyone felt that I was able to do my job correctly. And I did.
|
|
|
Post by BSam on Oct 27, 2006 16:16:09 GMT -5
so she;s not as good as tragedy because she's doing the same thing as tragedy did That made absolutely no sense whatsoever.. incorrect
|
|
|
Post by Libitina on Oct 27, 2006 17:58:42 GMT -5
Well, Trag picked more qualified mods. That's a bit different.
|
|
|
Post by BSam on Oct 27, 2006 18:29:27 GMT -5
i think, in terms of the ggreetings forum TE and amanda are perfectly qualified
|
|
|
Post by PJ on Oct 27, 2006 19:18:12 GMT -5
i think, in terms of the ggreetings forum TE and amanda are perfectly qualified True. But both of them? Seems a little overqualified.
|
|