|
Post by Seymour Glass on Aug 6, 2010 14:52:51 GMT -5
He thought that Shirley (Olaf in disguise) was an attractive woman.
|
|
|
Post by Dante on Aug 7, 2010 9:05:13 GMT -5
I was thinking more of his idea of someone being his "partner" involving them making his meals and ironing his shirts. But there is an interesting irony there.
Edit: On second thoughts, it's not really irony, just completely appropriate.
|
|
snicket993
Reptile Researcher
"The world is quiet here"
Posts: 15
|
Post by snicket993 on Nov 24, 2010 21:41:50 GMT -5
He thought that Shirley (Olaf in disguise) was an attractive woman. Thats because he didn't know that was Olaf.
|
|
|
Post by allegedly bryan on Nov 24, 2010 22:45:17 GMT -5
He thought that Shirley (Olaf in disguise) was an attractive woman. Thats because he didn't know that was Olaf. He still looked like a man so...
|
|
|
Post by Lachrymose on Jan 17, 2011 20:53:53 GMT -5
It could just mean that he's quite stupid.
|
|
|
Post by Dante on Jan 18, 2011 2:49:33 GMT -5
It may well be both, of course. Sir and/or Charles being gay is the subtext rather than something that's openly-stated.
|
|
|
Post by littlelaurence on Mar 3, 2011 15:36:23 GMT -5
It's a joke. All of them are oblivious to everything. Personally, I see it as no more than dramatic irony - the joke that the children can see through everything, but the grown adults can't. Part of that is probably so that children reading it feel less patronized, and to relate to the idea that adults seem to misunderstand / dismiss what they are trying to say.
|
|
|
Post by Dante on Mar 3, 2011 15:40:41 GMT -5
Yeah, I completely agree. I think this is something that Handler's implicitly suggested he supports in interviews - in relation to his performances at various events, he's said that (he thinks) children love to catch adults out in lies, and that's definitely related to patronisation and feelings of superiority over adults. Still, in circumstances like this we may or may not to read in additional characterisation, although I think the specific instance cited at the start of this thread might be reaching a bit.
|
|