|
|
Post by Sixteen on Apr 6, 2013 9:44:58 GMT -5
The member most notable for some kind of negative quality, I suppose.
|
|
|
|
Post by Anka on Apr 6, 2013 13:01:32 GMT -5
If you have any more suggestions please tell me until tomorrow, because then I'm going to make a poll. Until now the awards people said we don't need are: - Most Active - Most Valued Poster And the new suggestions are: - Best Organizer - Most Rebellious - Maybe a second category for "Best Story"The poll will have all these options, and everyone can vote for two of them. The two awards that have the most votes will exist  |
|
|
|
Post by Skelly Craig on Apr 6, 2013 14:30:51 GMT -5
The member most notable for some kind of negative quality, I suppose. Well that'd be something different to Most Rebellious then. So I'm still in favour of including that award in the poll, Anka. |
|
|
|
Post by Christmas Chief on Apr 6, 2013 15:05:07 GMT -5
I'm not sure how it's different - rebelliousness can be considered a negative quality.
|
|
|
|
Post by Skelly Craig on Apr 6, 2013 15:14:43 GMT -5
Most qualities can be considered negative by someone or another. And generally this one isn't considered negative per se.
Someone like ADR could be considered a good contender for Most Notorious, as she was a horrible moderator.
Someone like Mike Mountain could be considered a contender for Most Rebellious, as he disregards social norms in the forums.
I think we can agree that those two people are totally different in their way.
|
|
|
|
Post by Christmas Chief on Apr 6, 2013 16:26:51 GMT -5
Well, equally you could say ADR disregarded numerous administration norms, some of which are indeed considered social; you might also classify Mike Mountain as notorious on the account that he's known for disregarding the formalities considered social. My point is simply that the one encompasses the other, and the distinction, at least as I understand it, isn't recognizably different enough to constitute as its own award.
|
|
|
|
Post by Anka on Apr 6, 2013 16:28:58 GMT -5
The member most notable for some kind of negative quality, I suppose. Well that'd be something different to Most Rebellious then. So I'm still in favour of including that award in the poll, Anka. Okay, I changed it. Sorry. |
|
|
|
Post by Hermes on Apr 6, 2013 16:44:40 GMT -5
But 'notorious' is by definition a bad thing, while 'rebellious' may be good or bad, depending whether one agrees with the norms. For instance, a lot of people seem to think that writing 'Oh you' all the time departs from social norms, so someone who did this would be rebellious, but I never had a problem with it, so I wouldn't call them notorious.
|
|
|
|
Post by penne on Apr 6, 2013 17:21:46 GMT -5
Is ''notorious" by definition a bad thing? I never knew that.
|
|
|
|
Post by Skelly Craig on Apr 6, 2013 17:40:18 GMT -5
But 'notorious' is by definition a bad thing, while 'rebellious' may be good or bad, depending whether one agrees with the norms. For instance, a lot of people seem to think that writing 'Oh you' all the time departs from social norms, so someone who did this would be rebellious, but I never had a problem with it, so I wouldn't call them notorious. Yeah, that's pretty much how I thought of it. I think it is an interesting option to include with 667's number of diverse users and disputes going on and off anyway, but if people don't like the option then they won't vote for it. |
|
|
|
Post by Anka on Apr 6, 2013 17:41:33 GMT -5
I also didn't know that "notorious" always means something negative.
|
|
|
|
Post by Charles Vane on Apr 6, 2013 17:58:02 GMT -5
Like (as a wild example) most dedicated to Teen Wolf. I accept this prestigious and coveted award. Thank you so much. |
|
|
|
Post by Charles Vane on Apr 6, 2013 18:01:09 GMT -5
There should be a sexiest. Or maybe an award for the person who is most like a puppy, by that I mean adorable. Or like a BFF award because normally "romantic" pairings are nominated along with buddies and thats lame.
|
|
|
|
Post by Charles Vane on Apr 6, 2013 18:02:15 GMT -5
ohhh also best fight or miss universe
|
|
|
|
Post by Hermes on Apr 7, 2013 12:34:21 GMT -5
Is ''notorious" by definition a bad thing? I never knew that. Oh dear. So, have you been voting for people you like for this award in the past? . Or like a BFF award because normally "romantic" pairings are nominated along with buddies and thats lame. I like having romantic pairings competing against friendships and enmities. It spices things up. |
|
