|
|
Post by SadOccasion on Sept 17, 2006 21:17:15 GMT -5
I found this on Wikpedia, so we can't be sure if this is for real or not, but the Wikipedia article on The End cited this as an excerpt from an interview and it reveals some... shocking information.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sora on Sept 17, 2006 21:20:59 GMT -5
Oh my god. This can't be real. Why would Handler reveal THE biggest thing from The End?
And because of the sugar bowl? Why? How could this happen?
|
|
|
|
Post by Gigi on Sept 17, 2006 21:22:37 GMT -5
That doesn't sound real. Handler doesn't give out so much detail, he's far too mysterious in his answers.
|
|
|
|
Post by SadOccasion on Sept 17, 2006 21:23:43 GMT -5
I doubted it, too, but I don't see why someone would be prompted to make it up...
|
|
|
|
Post by PJ on Sept 17, 2006 21:25:12 GMT -5
Bah, humbug.
|
|
|
|
Post by SadOccasion on Sept 17, 2006 21:27:33 GMT -5
If anyone can find WHAT interview this is from, that would be helpful. It seems to be from some person or publication with the initials "NG"...
I'll see what I can do...
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 17, 2006 21:30:45 GMT -5
well it does kind of make sense but I don't think it's real also from wikipedia: * Many people speculate that the sugar bowl's secrets will be revealed in book the thirteenth. A recent website has posted the contents of it; for those of you who would like to know, go to www.vfdsugarbowlsecret.com. (Most computers aren't suitable for displaying the page. If you don't have a 3.89-bit connection, you may need to download the page onto a disk, and modify the disk's application code.) * There is a rumor going around that lemony snicket.com[8] contains a secret page that tells the contents of the sugar bowl and its connection to book the thirteenth. * Lemony himself has confirmed that the Baudelaire's have come in contact with the sugar bowl earlier in the series and have not noticed it. * You can learn more here[9] |
|
|
|
Post by s on Sept 17, 2006 22:12:33 GMT -5
Wikipedia's nonsense when talking about things like this. I wouldn't trust it. After all, if enough people agree, they can create their own Wikiality. And there are a lot of stupid people who agree with each other.
Basically, no. There's not way it's real.
|
|
|
|
Post by Dante on Sept 18, 2006 3:00:21 GMT -5
Complete fiction. Try Googling any quote from that "interview" - no results. Misplaced apostrophes, misplaced capitalisation, and giving away an idiotic amount of information - check, check, and check for fake.
Like most aSoUE articles on Wikipedia (check out the sugar bowl article - in particular, the part where it claims that Kit is only "pretending" to be pregnant), that page is full of rampant speculation and invented information. People do it all the time - they want attention, they want to feel clever and superior, or they want to spread their own stupid theories, half the time. That particular information was edited in by an IP user rather than a registered Wikipedia member, which often the mark of such a person. Seriously, people, just don't read Wikipedia's aSoUE articles. Just don't. You will only come away with idiotic lies and the lame theories of stupid kids.
There's no reason whatsoever to keep this thread open, as the information in it is so obviously false. If anyone seriously wants it open, then you can try PMing me with a very good reason why I should open it. Like, you know, a reliable source for that interview. (Which, by the way, you'll never find as it's made-up.)
Locked.
Edit: Not even going to touch the stuff Hatramroany's quoted. Seriously, though, people, I'm beginning to think you'll believe anything.
Edit Again: That fake interview and that rubbish about the sugar bowl were both edited in by the same IP. That same IP contributed to the page on Lemony Snicket "Lemony Snicket is the Baudelaire's Dad (Lemony Snicket is just his V.F.D. name)" and "Lemony Snicket set the Baudelaire's house on fire." All these edits were made on the same day, within minutes of each other. Seriously, guys, do you really want to believe a person who goes around editing spammy rubbish like this into Wikipedia?
|
|
