|
|
Post by xangelkimzx on Apr 20, 2004 7:13:15 GMT -5
Yeah, me too.... please let me be on the jury....   |
|
|
|
Post by Mental on Apr 20, 2004 7:13:59 GMT -5
you too what
seen liar liar
or seen various cout case movies
|
|
|
|
Post by DetectiveDupin on Apr 20, 2004 9:52:18 GMT -5
I will sit in the crowd, making random fits of clapping or making unneccesery sounds.
*sits and moos*
|
|
|
|
Post by MambaduMal on Apr 20, 2004 10:06:12 GMT -5
I did notice some other insults, but a lot of them seemed to come from disputes in which he began insulting first. None of those posts have been brought to my attention except Jerome's.
I did give J a strike for excessive insults towards Jerome.
|
|
|
|
Post by MambaduMal on Apr 20, 2004 10:14:37 GMT -5
All of the spots are taken. I've given Kobolos the part of prosecutor, because I trust that he will post legitimate, concrete evidence.
Please present your evidence, Kobolos and Oliver diLustro Halliwell. Jury members will read the evidence, and each vote either "guilty" or "not guilty" when all of the evidence has been posted.
Should the votes be PM'ed to me, or would it be better if they were posted publically?
|
|
|
|
Post by Pester, Rumormonger on Apr 20, 2004 10:57:18 GMT -5
I don't mean to sully Skalu's name or anything, but do you think that he's really a match for Kobolos? Skalu hardly goes to disturbing discussion and such at all, and I'd have to say that Kobolos is the best one here.
Sorry Kobolos, I have to call you overqualified again.
|
|
|
|
Post by DetectiveDupin on Apr 20, 2004 10:59:20 GMT -5
*is sick of being an audience member*
Can I be in the Jury please? I can still make mooing noises.
*joins the Jury bench, and is ready to listen to evidence*
|
|
|
|
Post by Skalu on Apr 20, 2004 12:30:27 GMT -5
I don't mean to sully Skalu's name or anything, but do you think that he's really a match for Kobolos? Skalu hardly goes to disturbing discussion and such at all, and I'd have to say that Kobolos is the best one here. Sorry Kobolos, I have to call you overqualified again. I have to admit that I don't post much in DD and that I don't know much about the case, so if anyone would like to take over, like Pester or someone, feel free to say. Iwon't be offended. |
|
|
|
Post by Pester, Rumormonger on Apr 20, 2004 12:49:38 GMT -5
swans is pretty much who I had in mind, being the best qualified and the most experienced in arguing with Kobolos, in addition to being the only prominent member who hasn't insulted or been insulted by Jerome.
|
|
|
|
Post by SlightlyMad on Apr 20, 2004 13:24:16 GMT -5
Jerome Squalor can be a bit exsessive with his insults but he could be on a probation. I 'll find some cold, hard evidence in a sec.
I am ambigious in this court case.
|
|
|
|
Post by xangelkimzx on Apr 20, 2004 13:39:40 GMT -5
swans is pretty much who I had in mind, being the best qualified and the most experienced in arguing with Kobolos, in addition to being the only prominent member who hasn't insulted or been insulted by Jerome. Actually, Jerome has not insulted that many people. You are sounding like Jerome does insults for a hobby, well, he doesn't. If you get to know Jerome, like I do, he is a very nice person actually. I know he seems all arguey and tough, but underneath it all he's a real nice/kind person. And when he does insults, he only does it for protection, like all humans do. He doesn't just suddenly come and insult someone one day, he only insults people when they insult him. I know sometimes he makes mistakes, but he doesn't mean to. Seriously. He so shouldn't be banned from 667... Oh, and I applied for a jury position, what happened? Cuz I applied before loadsa people... before you said there were no spaces...  Am I in then? |
|
|
|
Post by JeromeSqualor on Apr 20, 2004 14:22:19 GMT -5
Wow... swans definitely can argue... Shei s 100% correct... I take full repsonsibilty for all insults I have said, but as she stated throughout the whole post, I am not the only one guilty... My only mistake was not reporting every insult... Oliver, I am dearly sorry, and I don't need to offend you, but I think swans is way more qualified for the job, and can see things through the correct manner and state of mind... After all, Koo is 20, and you are 11... I hardly find that fair... Whereas swans is around the similar age of 20... I do have to right to chose who is my lawyer, right? If so, I choose swans... |
|
|
|
Post by JeromeSqualor on Apr 20, 2004 14:22:54 GMT -5
Than you, Kimia... You are a truly loyal friend...
|
|
|
|
Post by SlightlyMad on Apr 20, 2004 14:23:09 GMT -5
kobo is 33 and swans is nearly 21 and oliver is almost 14
|
|
|
|
Post by xangelkimzx on Apr 20, 2004 14:36:14 GMT -5
Swans is completely right. Wow, I adore that person so much. Go Swans, and Go Jerome... ;D ;D ;D ;D I'm sure you'll make it
|
|
Proud member of the Prudish Society of America
Am I in then?
