|
|
Post by Triangle Eyes on Aug 24, 2007 19:25:05 GMT -5
Every member has a page. The main purpose is to say what pages you focus on editing and post awards they gave you and stuff. I think Edwin edited mine and put "A Member of 667 Dark Avenue" or something like that.
|
|
|
|
Post by ineedyourhelp on Aug 24, 2007 19:30:50 GMT -5
are you saying that 667 Dark Avenue members have pages on wikipedia?
|
|
|
|
Post by Triangle Eyes on Aug 24, 2007 19:32:45 GMT -5
No. Wikipedia members.
|
|
|
|
Post by ineedyourhelp on Aug 24, 2007 19:33:37 GMT -5
Oh, ok. I just didn't read it right. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
Post by Triangle Eyes on Aug 26, 2007 16:35:22 GMT -5
I should get involved more with this Wikipedia stuff. I made this page. So, like, I'm experienced and stuff. |
|
|
|
Post by Triangle Eyes on Aug 28, 2007 6:49:10 GMT -5
We're not advertising. We're just adding information and citing it. The citation just happens to be at 667.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sixteen on Aug 28, 2007 13:08:23 GMT -5
We're citing genuine information, such as Gigi's reference list which is the only one on the internet that we know of.
|
|
|
|
Post by Triangle Eyes on Aug 28, 2007 13:15:31 GMT -5
It's not ridiculous information, it is, like sixteen said, genuine. And why are you so against 667 being mentioned a few times on Wikipedia?
|
|
|
|
Post by Dante on Aug 28, 2007 13:53:22 GMT -5
I imagine the suspicion is that you're simply searching for excuses to link 667 on Wikipedia with the implicit aim of advertisement, or at least self-promotion - that is, you are suspected of being more interested in promoting 667 than in actually supporting Wikipedia. Even if you have genuinely useful information that you want to share, it can still be true that you also want to advertise - and vice-versa, which might be something to mention in edit disputes. I'm not sure how you could prove your own neutrality when linking to 667 on Wikipedia.
|
|
|
|
Post by ineedyourhelp on Aug 28, 2007 16:06:11 GMT -5
I all for the idea of linking 667 to Wikipedia, but we can't say that we aren't trying to gain publicicty or new recruits by doing this.
|
|
