|
|
Post by RockSunner on Nov 26, 2005 21:40:18 GMT -5
Well purhaps fernald and fiona have a long lost sibling...I mean, to fit in with the three sibling pattern....  Yes, but they aren't the same age, so they can't be triplets... unless there are two more Fionas and two more Fernalds around...  |
|
|
|
Post by lauren on Nov 26, 2005 21:48:06 GMT -5
No I don't think they are triplets I think they have another sibling that's all
|
|
|
|
Post by Sugary Snicket on Nov 28, 2005 16:14:29 GMT -5
The Bauds are a group of three and they are not triplets. So it does not have to be that they are triplets.
|
|
vfd2264
Bewildered Beginner
Posts: 8
|
Post by vfd2264 on Nov 28, 2005 16:39:30 GMT -5
Hmm... that would be interesting, but wouldn't either of them had mentioned if they had another sibling in TGG?
|
|
|
|
Post by hugmydictator on Nov 28, 2005 16:45:57 GMT -5
Unless they though he/she was dead. Just like when the Quagmires though Quigley was dead.
|
|
vfd2264
Bewildered Beginner
Posts: 8
|
Post by vfd2264 on Nov 28, 2005 16:52:16 GMT -5
but the Quagmires were quick to mention that they had had another sibling. Wouldn't Fiona have at least mentioned something while they were on the sub?
|
|
|
|
Post by hugmydictator on Nov 28, 2005 16:55:45 GMT -5
Not if her parents keep it away from her. They might be ashamed that they lost a son or daughter and don't want her to know.
|
|
|
|
Post by lauren on Nov 28, 2005 18:26:52 GMT -5
Yes I can imagine that happening...anywhos...I just want to confirm something...
On pg 223 TPP "If I hadn't been on the roof,"Esme retorted, "the sugar bowl would have been delivered to V.F.D.! Besides, I was guarding---" It never actually tells us what she was guarding...but we all assumed the medusoid mycelium, right?
|
|
|
|
Post by SnicketFires on Nov 28, 2005 21:05:33 GMT -5
Yes I can imagine that happening...anywhos...I just want to confirm something... On pg 223 TPP "If I hadn't been on the roof,"Esme retorted, "the sugar bowl would have been delivered to V.F.D.! Besides, I was guarding---" It never actually tells us what she was guarding...but we all assumed the medusoid mycelium, right? We assume that, yes, because there wasn't anything else on the roof, really, for her to be guarding. |
|
|
|
Post by Sugary Snicket on Nov 30, 2005 16:25:48 GMT -5
..... or was there? It IS possible that she was guarding a kidnap victim to make sure that either 1, the victim didn't escape, or 2, no one found out about the prisoner.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jacques the Environmentalist on Nov 30, 2005 22:09:34 GMT -5
Fiona/fernald sibling? No. There's that picture and about them being ashamed to tell them about losing a sibling: Fernald? They'd lost him and they told the Baudelaires who were pretty close to complete strangers, so I don't think they would've hidden the fact of a lost sibling from their own children/stepchildren.
|
|
|
|
Post by Grace on Dec 4, 2005 10:14:06 GMT -5
If they thought their third sibling was dead they would definitely discuss it, right? You can't "forget" or act like you forget something like that.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sugary Snicket on Dec 10, 2005 13:33:04 GMT -5
Maybe Widdershins had to kill their sibling? :/
|
|
|
|
Post by Dear Dairy on Dec 10, 2005 21:04:17 GMT -5
But if he did, and considering Fiona's loyalty to Fernald, wouldn't she be angry at Widdershins? She seems as loyal/close to Widdy as she is to Fernald.
|
|
|
|
Post by lauren on Dec 11, 2005 6:20:35 GMT -5
Yes, but she doesn't know Widdershins (supposedly) killed the sibling does she  EDIT: actually tat wouldn't make sense because if Widdershins were their stepfather he would have to had killed the other sibling when fiona and fernald were alive....maybe their mother or their real father had to kill the other sibling |
|
