|
Post by Dear Dairy on Dec 13, 2005 0:25:38 GMT -5
Oh, man, that would be AWFUL!!!! This series of events can't be that unfortunate, can it?
|
|
|
Post by thedoctororwell on Dec 13, 2005 4:57:13 GMT -5
In fact... It is ! I really want an horrible ending ! Actually I would like to see Mrs Baudelaire dying in front of her children five minutes after they met at last !
|
|
|
Post by Juan Roberto Montoya De Toledo on Dec 13, 2005 5:54:19 GMT -5
I'm glad to see that you didn't call her 'Mrs Beatrice Baudelaire'. And yes, that would be tragic. Maybe funny, depending how he does it.
|
|
|
Post by callum on Dec 16, 2005 5:49:18 GMT -5
what would be hilarios is that the parents faked they're own death to escape the children ha ha ha
|
|
|
Post by Ennui on Dec 16, 2005 6:28:08 GMT -5
God, I certainly would. The Baudelaires were self-satisfied little imps in Book One...
|
|
|
Post by Sugary Snicket on Dec 19, 2005 10:23:59 GMT -5
HEY! They weren't like that at all..... sad and up set, yes, calm and quiet, yes, but not imps! And what's wrong with being happy with yourself? I'm the craziest, freakiest, weirdest person besides Skeleton that I know, and I'm VERY happy with myself, or "self-satisfied", as you so claim.
|
|
|
Post by Flutes Are Better on Dec 27, 2005 1:00:14 GMT -5
What The Flip? ? This book came out in October and I waited all the way 'till Christmas to get my hands on it and read it? ?? What? My goodness I really need to look into these thing some more! Does anybody know when the 13th book comes out?
|
|
|
Post by Dante on Dec 27, 2005 3:42:31 GMT -5
Autumn next year, probably October, possibly the 13th, but nothing is certain yet. The best place to search for information (using the handy Search button within a thread) would be the Official Book the Thirteenth Speculation Thread. (I should probably start adding concrete information to the first post, but we don't actually have any concrete information yet.) Speaking of which, since discussion is pretty much dying here, and the book's been out for ages, this thread will probably be unstickied come some appropriate point, such as 2006.
|
|
|
Post by Sugary Snicket on Dec 29, 2005 13:02:13 GMT -5
It's beginning to get stale. And fighting's breaking out over trivial matters back from book 1.
|
|
js927
Reptile Researcher
Smile it's free!
Posts: 37
|
Post by js927 on Dec 30, 2005 15:08:26 GMT -5
God, I certainly would. The Baudelaires were self-satisfied little imps in Book One... They were not 'imps'! They just kinda took their lives for granted, but they're not imps!
|
|
|
Post by voguefashion on Dec 30, 2005 17:29:00 GMT -5
Hmm.
|
|
js927
Reptile Researcher
Smile it's free!
Posts: 37
|
Post by js927 on Dec 31, 2005 12:53:44 GMT -5
But whatever it doesn't matter if they were imps or not!
Has anyone made up a timeline yet?
|
|
|
Post by Alfred is Present on Jan 3, 2006 19:00:27 GMT -5
What's an "imp"? [/stupid]
Are the people wondering why Fiona and Fernald are only two, and not three? Probably, the other is pregnant when she left/abandoned/died. Or she brought the baby with her to their doom, I guess.
|
|
Antenora
Detriment Deleter
Fiendish Philologist
Put down that harpoon gun, in the name of these wonderful birds!
Posts: 15,891
Likes: 113
|
Post by Antenora on Jan 3, 2006 20:16:34 GMT -5
An imp is a minor demon, also used as a word for an annoying little child.
And it's possible that Fernald and Fiona's third sibling was never actually born, or they never met him/her because they were separated from their mother before the birth of that child.
|
|
|
Post by Sora on Jan 3, 2006 21:37:59 GMT -5
Well that could be possible, in some strange, but such a theroy just seems too complicated of a plot line to include in the concluding novel.
|
|