|
Post by Dante on Oct 24, 2011 14:24:16 GMT -5
You might find the location of the series to be a more controversial matter than that, kkunz156. I advise you to take a look in the Perilous Places sub-board (in Sardonic Series) for a bit more discussion on that subject. I think the Bermuda Triangle is unlikely to be alluded to in connection to the Great Unknown for the simple fact that the series does not have a great interest in visiting real places, just in making mostly offhand references to them; the Great Unknown would precede the Bermuda Triangle rather than vice-versa, I think.
|
|
|
Post by B. on Oct 25, 2011 10:28:01 GMT -5
Hmm....well Snicket has said the new series will "approach that question mark from another angle." So maybe we'll find out more soon.
I agree with Dante, it seems to be a lot like the Bermuda Triangle. Another thing- metaphorically it could be the great unknown of growing up and moving on.
|
|
|
Post by Dante on Oct 25, 2011 10:36:14 GMT -5
I prefer the metaphorical, symbolic explanations, which is why I'm kinda happy to just let it remain unexplained.
|
|
|
Post by csc on Oct 25, 2011 10:43:26 GMT -5
i think its sort of like a black hole thing, no one knows exactly what it is and no one can tell you cause no one has come out. So it's kinda like death.
|
|
|
Post by B. on Oct 28, 2011 10:59:07 GMT -5
Not Death....I don't believe that the Quagmires are dead.
|
|
|
Post by vbaudelaire on Nov 12, 2012 13:58:49 GMT -5
Well, I think that it's the people who say they are on one side of the schism but are really on the other side or not in the schism at all.
|
|
|
Post by Dante on Nov 12, 2012 14:41:07 GMT -5
A vessel of traitors or defectors from V.F.D., you mean?
|
|
|
Post by moseymoo on Sept 15, 2013 13:51:35 GMT -5
I think that it, like so many aspects of the novels, has the same metaphorical and literal state: The Great Unknown is exactly what its name suggests. Olaf, like many other 'baddies' within the series, prefers to remain ignorant; yet the Quagmires, like so many other 'goodies', feel the compulsion to face down The Great Unknown and discover its reality. In essence, I don't believe that it is a great evil, or a force of good, just an unknown quantity, which is why so many people fear it. I'm not sure even Handler has a concrete idea of what it really is, although I like to think he does.
|
|
|
Post by The Duchess on Sept 27, 2013 15:54:06 GMT -5
The bombinating beast!
|
|
|
Post by Dante on Sept 27, 2013 16:00:45 GMT -5
I think the Bombinating Beast is the Great Unknown, but I don't think that the Great Unknown is the Bombinating Beast.
|
|
|
Post by Dante on Jun 9, 2014 11:50:21 GMT -5
I don't know that it's a MacGuffin, exactly. It's not the object of anyone's search - not the unknown in itself. Rather the reverse, if anything. But many MacGuffins can be said to have been consumed by it.
|
|
|
Post by Dante on Jun 10, 2014 3:43:17 GMT -5
I think you were half right. One of the characteristics of the MacGuffin is that it doesn't necessarily matter what it is, because its main purpose is not to be significant in itself but for the characters to seek it. The sugar bowl is a MacGuffin. The Great Unknown isn't because nobody's seeking it - like I said, rather the reverse - but I would agree that its unknown and uncertain nature is the most important quality it possesses. You could almost call it an anti-MacGuffin; like a MacGuffin, knowing what it really is isn't important, but instead it's something the characters are for the most part actively trying to avoid.
|
|
|
Post by Hermes on Jun 10, 2014 10:49:55 GMT -5
I've always found the concept of a McGuffin rather confusing. For any object that figures in a story, you can say that its purpose for us, the readers, is to advance the plot - but for the characters it must have some other significance: how could it advance the plot if it didn't?
|
|
|
Post by Dante on Jun 10, 2014 16:12:18 GMT -5
I think the irrelevance of the MacGuffin's purpose is supposed to be that it is in some way interchangeable. There are many explanations as to what's in the sugar bowl (or to what the Great Unknown is), for instance; the stolen submarine plans might as well be for planes or tanks or bombs and we won't ever need to understand exactly what's so special about them; that suitcase could contain money or a radioactive element or incriminating photographs of a public figure. The story is more about what people will do for the MacGuffin rather than what they will do with it. I admit it's rather vague, but that's how I rationalise it.
|
|
|
Post by Tryina Denouement on Jun 12, 2014 11:38:47 GMT -5
I always thought that the Great Unknown was a metaphor or the Merlion as interpreted by V.F.D
|
|