|
|
Post by trish on Feb 8, 2004 21:05:58 GMT -5
Yes, I like Cho at first, when she was always crying and stuff, poor tortured soul of hers, but then she just seemed like an annoying crybaby. I am glad Harry broke up with her. (or whatever happened with them)  |
|
|
|
Post by No One Mourns the Wicked on Feb 10, 2004 18:40:40 GMT -5
Cho was always annoying to me, so I'm glad Harry didn't go on any more dates with her. She just wasn't right for him. shame.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jacques the Environmentalist on Feb 10, 2004 21:12:17 GMT -5
Yes Cho was an idiot. I think in every book we learn more about how James and Lily died.
1) That they died and were killed by Lord Voldie.
2) that the one who killed them planned to come back with a diary, and all about their murderer. His actual name, halfblood, teen years etc...
3) How they used the Fidelius charm, that it was in their cottage, James fought first to protect Lily, Sirius was good after all and Wormtail who was still alive betrayed them.
4) They were killed witht the Avada Kedavra killing curse, but that Lily's love somehow reversed it.
5) That Lord Voldemort wished to kill them not only because they were powerful and a threat but because he was afraid that their son would fulfill a prophecy and kill him.
What shall we find out in book 6?
|
|
|
|
Post by trish on Feb 11, 2004 22:15:01 GMT -5
We will probably find out that Harry is invincible to poison. For some reason about Lily or something. I have good reason to think he is invincible to poison anyway. When he got bitten by that acromantula, he didn't die, did he? |
|
|
|
Post by No One Mourns the Wicked on Feb 12, 2004 19:04:37 GMT -5
Hey, that's a good point. I never thought of that.
|
|
|
|
Post by trish on Feb 12, 2004 21:29:53 GMT -5
Thank you, thank you. *bows* Hey wait, you were talkin about me right?  |
|
|
|
Post by embah on Feb 13, 2004 1:36:08 GMT -5
That's a good point, but I have to disagree. I don't think that he's invincible to poison, because in the 2nd book when the basilisks fang went into him, he would've died of the poison, if not for fawks coming to his rescue.
|
|
|
|
Post by No One Mourns the Wicked on Feb 13, 2004 18:33:45 GMT -5
Oh, well, that was a basilisk. Maybe that was just too strong for invincible poisoning abilities. I don't know.
Yes, Hermy, I was talking to you. ;D ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by trish on Feb 13, 2004 21:02:49 GMT -5
Ah, but have you ever read "Fantastic Beasts and where to find them"? It says in there that a basilisk is so rare that it has poison that most antidotes cannot cure, so maybe Harry's invincibility to poison does not strech that far. Perhaps.   ;D |
|
|
|
Post by Jacques the Environmentalist on Feb 14, 2004 21:52:10 GMT -5
I don't remember the acromantula biting him... And how do u know their teeth are poisonous?
|
|
;D
