|
|
Post by DetectiveDupin on Apr 21, 2004 11:13:26 GMT -5
I'm going to do everything I can do to keep you on 667, Jerome.  This strikes me as odd...: Five Jury Members:
1. Pandora
2. Jackal
3. luckylemon
4. Marie Aristocats
5. JuanSanchez Villa-Lobos RamirezThe jury have to be people with no exact opinion, right? If Jackal, luckylemon and Marie are all going to stand up for him, no matter what the evidence says, it is unfair. So I say that you need more jury that have no opinion on him, like Pandora, and Juan. *raises hand* I'd be happy to do it...I won't stand up for him, or stand up against him, but I will listen to evidence and decide at the end what I am thinking. That sounds more fair then what we have at the moment, right? |
|
|
|
Post by JeromeSqualor on Apr 21, 2004 11:19:25 GMT -5
This strikes me as odd...: Five Jury Members:
1. Pandora
2. Jackal
3. luckylemon
4. Marie Aristocats
5. JuanSanchez Villa-Lobos RamirezThe jury have to be people with no exact opinion, right? If Jackal, luckylemon and Marie are all going to stand up for him, no matter what the evidence says, it is unfair. So I say that you need more jury that have no opinion on him, like Pandora, and Juan. *raises hand* I'd be happy to do it...I won't stand up for him, or stand up against him, but I will listen to evidence and decide at the end what I am thinking. That sounds more fair then what we have at the moment, right? Um... Actually, if no one minds me speaking, no one ever said that luckylemon or Kimia were just going to outright stand up for me... And as far as BRob, he actually probablt is not just going to outright vote for me... He could have just read throughout Disturbing Discussion and already agree that I should not be banned... |
|
|
|
Post by JeromeSqualor on Apr 21, 2004 11:21:48 GMT -5
And, if you want to go as far as saying, because some poeple have opinions of me, they should not be allowed on the juryt, then you most definitely should not be allowed... Just because I never responded rudely towards you, I have heard of your conversations on A.O.L. about me, and how you believe I am a "racists git", which clearly tells that you have a foul opinion of me... i hardly see that as a fair jury member...
|
|
|
|
Post by DetectiveDupin on Apr 21, 2004 11:22:51 GMT -5
Kimia and luckylemon already like you as a friend, so they will not vote against you.
BRob hasn't read any evidence...the trial has not begun, and he can not make up his mind.
I'm not saying I want you to be banned, I'm saying I want it to be a fair trial, and with three who will vote you innocent no matter what, and two who have their own choice, it is unfair because no matter what they say, they are already beaten by three votes saying you are innocent, by three people who will vote you innocent because you are a friend.
I mean, they won't vote you guilty will they? I wouldn't do that as a friend, but I wouldn't run for it if it were a great friend, because then I'd agree it were unfair.
|
|
|
|
Post by JeromeSqualor on Apr 21, 2004 11:29:20 GMT -5
Kimia just agrees with what I say... You have no real proof that she likes me... BRob could have been reading the threads I post in from the beginnig... You do not know... In fact, I don't know any of these people in rea life... What would stop tem from voting I should be banned? They will probably never actaully meet me... I am positive they will be fair and vote justly... Why should we bend the rules, after the jury was already selected, because you feel it is unfair?
|
|
|
|
Post by DetectiveDupin on Apr 21, 2004 11:40:29 GMT -5
Proof? How about this?
KIMIA AND GEORGE MSN CONVERSATION, TAKEN PLACE ON 17TH ARPIL (4 DAYS AGO)
*Names changed to make it easier to read
Kimia: y dus evry1 disagree/bully jerome
George: we just dont agree with anything he says
Kimia: y?
George: i just...dont
Kimia: y..
Kimia: there must b a reason
George: I think he's very rude with his opinions
Kimia: oh
Kimia: but e's always nice 2 me
George: *shrugs*
George: its' because you agree
Kimia: i dont
Kimia: he just always is nice 2 me.
Kimia: hes 1 of my e-frends
George: Okay then.
See...she thinks of you as a friend, and won't want to go against you.
The whole points is, you can't have a valid opinion on everything before we begin, like luckylemon and Robobo. I have no opinion on it yet...I like you, but if the evidence points to that you are being rude and stupid, then I'll agree. I don't think those three will, because they all like you as a friend.
|
|
|
|
Post by JeromeSqualor on Apr 21, 2004 12:16:29 GMT -5
Ha... Why don't you show your and Kimia's chat where you stated your "opinion" on me, proving that you, most definitely, should not be on the jury... Why do you want me banned so much, anyway? I never did anything to you...
|
|
|
|
Post by DetectiveDupin on Apr 21, 2004 12:38:57 GMT -5
I'm not saying I want you to be banned, I'm saying I want it to be a fair trial. Did you read that? I just think we need it to be fair. |
|
|
|
Post by JeromeSqualor on Apr 21, 2004 12:41:36 GMT -5
Did you read that? I just think we need it to be fair. Actually no, I didn't see it... |
|
|
|
Post by DetectiveDupin on Apr 21, 2004 12:44:13 GMT -5
Alright then.
I just think it is unfair if you're going to be found innocent no matter what...I haven't seen the evidence and things like that, so I can't say what I think...but even if you are a guilty, you'll be found innocent by the jury...you can see what I'm saying here, right?
|
|
|
|
Post by JeromeSqualor on Apr 21, 2004 12:57:12 GMT -5
I see what you think will happen, but it is wrong... I, at no time, have any jury members official vote... In fact, the only jury member I am even scarecly friends with is Kimia... But we barely even talk...
|
|
|
|
Post by xangelkimzx on Apr 21, 2004 13:22:30 GMT -5
Yeah! And George, will you stop it? It is obvious you just want me out of the jury because you are either jealous of me being on it, or you just don't like Jerome.
George, I know you say that you aren't biased and blahblah, but it's kinda obvious you hate Jerome.
Plus, stop trying to get me off the jury. I am not gonna just stick up for Jerome. I'm gonna think about things, then make desicions. So please stop trying to show points that I should be kicked out. And anyway, why should you be on the jury when you always say nasty stuff about Jerome?
|
|
|
|
Post by DetectiveDupin on Apr 21, 2004 13:23:24 GMT -5
Okay...I guess we'll see how it goes...I'll just go sit in the audience, and make annoying noises. *walks off and takes a seat*
EDIT: I do not say nasty stuff about Jerome...I like him perfectly fine, not as a friend, but I don't hate him...and I'm not trying to get you off the jury..I'm just thinking that we need more people who don't know him well. But I understand that it would be hard for you to agree one of your best e-friends to be banned from the site...that's right, isn't it.
|
|
|
|
Post by JeromeSqualor on Apr 21, 2004 13:24:30 GMT -5
Is that enough proof? For George saying nasty things, not the trial...
|
|
|
|
Post by xangelkimzx on Apr 21, 2004 13:39:44 GMT -5
George: Yes you do that, just sit in the audience please. And just - don't interfere with the jury, k?
Jerome: I dunno... but I don't think there are any good reasons for me not to be on the jury, because loadsa people here are your friends, that isn't bad, is it... ??
|
|
