|
Post by csc on Jun 7, 2012 11:01:25 GMT -5
You can come too, Brunch! We'll have one of those huge chocolate fountains as well, no wait, two of them, a clean one where people are expected to observe proper etiquette and hygiene when filling their cups/dipping their goodies into it, and another one that's a free-for-all, cleanliness be damned. Make that four, two in milk chocolate and two in white chocolate. Fun fact: People who are against gay marriage motivate me to plan the best wedding ever for myself. I'm already big on planning parties, but they bring out my inner Pinkie Pie! That sounds like great fun! Who doesn't love a good chocolate fountain? Edit: Narrator, now I can actually understand what you said on the other thread. There's actually no point in discussing this with you.
|
|
|
Post by thenarrator on Jun 7, 2012 13:45:31 GMT -5
Just as a side note, if God created the world and animals and humans, and according to Narrator, homosexuality is wrong, why are there 1500 animal species that exhibit homosexual behavior? Why would God give them that ability if it was 'wrong'? www.news-medical.net/news/2006/10/23/20718.aspxAlso I think there is nothing wrong with homosexuality. If gay people want to get married let them get married. Personally I just think that everyone is wound up over semantics. Could be because sin also is affecting creation. Think about it. God originally designed animals and human's to be plant eaters. Once sin came in, that aspect changed. Likewise, if sin came in and we have diseases, turmoil, earthquakes, death, etc, I think that likewise, animals exhibit this homosexual behavior because of man's sin and it's effects. Welcome to our troubles.
|
|
|
Post by csc on Jun 7, 2012 13:48:43 GMT -5
I think that you thinking homossexuality is a sin is a sin.
|
|
|
Post by Lady Whatever on Jun 7, 2012 13:57:00 GMT -5
So there's a correlation between the main cast of And Tango Makes Three, me finding ladies pretty, and earthquakes. Yup, your logic is absolutely impenetrable. I've seen the error of my ways, and will immediately break up with my girlfriend, go marry some random dude who will force me to take his surname and considers the idea of me having a career to be "optional", and crap out twelve children. But, seriously, if you want to live in a theocracy where people's religious opinions trump human rights and the idea that a healthy, vigorous sexuality that just happens to involve people of the same gender is related to natural disasters, go to Iran. You won't find anybody sympathetic to such nonsense here.
|
|
|
Post by thenarrator on Jun 7, 2012 14:06:08 GMT -5
I think that you thinking homossexuality is a sin is a sin. I may be sinning in your eyes, but that's your opinion and not reality. But, seriously, if you want to live in a theocracy where people's religious opinions trump human rights and the idea that a healthy, vigorous sexuality that just happens to involve people of the same gender is related to natural disasters, go to Iran. They...kill...Christians. They aren't even tolerant of our views. So, I'm done. I'm sure you all would like to go back and talk about the subject some more (and possibly swear at me behind my back, but I really don't care). So ive got other things to do.
|
|
|
Post by Songbird on Jun 7, 2012 14:23:18 GMT -5
Just as a side note, if God created the world and animals and humans, and according to Narrator, homosexuality is wrong, why are there 1500 animal species that exhibit homosexual behavior? Why would God give them that ability if it was 'wrong'? www.news-medical.net/news/2006/10/23/20718.aspxAlso I think there is nothing wrong with homosexuality. If gay people want to get married let them get married. Personally I just think that everyone is wound up over semantics. Could be because sin also is affecting creation. Think about it. God originally designed animals and human's to be plant eaters. Once sin came in, that aspect changed. Likewise, if sin came in and we have diseases, turmoil, earthquakes, death, etc, I think that likewise, animals exhibit this homosexual behavior because of man's sin and it's effects. Welcome to our troubles. Well I think that's ridiculous. Did you go to school? Do you know what earthquakes are? They are the result of Earth's plates shifting and touching each other which releases energy in the form of seismic waves. Now I do believe in God, but I also believe in science. Natural disasters basically are a way (I know this sounds harsh) to limit population. We are pretty much maxed out on resources so when there's an earthquake or tsunami or something it isn't because of homosexuals or sins or what not its because the makeup of our planet causes those things to happen. Animals being vegetarians have nothing to do with animals being homosexuals. That makes no sense. If you read the article you'll see that the only animal that does not exhibit homosexual tendencies is the sea urchin. This means that animals like deer who really only eat plants can be homosexual as well. So your argument makes no sense.
|
|
|
Post by csc on Jun 7, 2012 14:24:30 GMT -5
I think that you thinking homossexuality is a sin is a sin. I may be sinning in your eyes, but that's your opinion and not reality. And your opinion is obviously the reality? Also, who are you to talk about tolerance? EDIT: Could be because sin also is affecting creation. Think about it. God originally designed animals and human's to be plant eaters. Once sin came in, that aspect changed. Likewise, if sin came in and we have diseases, turmoil, earthquakes, death, etc, I think that likewise, animals exhibit this homosexual behavior because of man's sin and it's effects. Welcome to our troubles. Well I think that's ridiculous. Did you go to school? Do you know what earthquakes are? They are the result of Earth's plates shifting and touching each other which releases energy in the form of seismic waves. Now I do believe in God, but I also believe in science. Natural disasters basically are a way (I know this sounds harsh) to limit population. We are pretty much maxed out on resources so when there's an earthquake or tsunami or something it isn't because of homosexuals or sins or what not its because the makeup of our planet causes those things to happen. Animals being vegetarians have nothing to do with animals being homosexuals. That makes no sense. If you read the article you'll see that the only animal that does not exhibit homosexual tendencies is the sea urchin. This means that animals like deer who really only eat plants can be homosexual as well. So your argument makes no sense. And also, "God designed humans and animals to be plant eaters?" Carnivore animals exited much before humans ever did.
|
|
|
Post by thenarrator on Jun 7, 2012 14:50:51 GMT -5
Also, who are you to talk about tolerance? I said I was done.
|
|
|
Post by csc on Jun 7, 2012 14:55:16 GMT -5
Then why did you even reply?
|
|
|
Post by Lady Whatever on Jun 7, 2012 15:02:28 GMT -5
Some people are obsessed with getting in the last word. Like me. F.D, should I serve chicken or prime rib for my meat dish at my wedding?
|
|
|
Post by csc on Jun 7, 2012 15:13:09 GMT -5
Prime rib, please. I love me some ribs.
|
|
|
Post by Lady Whatever on Jun 7, 2012 15:31:40 GMT -5
It's one of my favourites, that's for sure, a nice rare cut. I need to think of two vegetables as a side as well. As for the cake, I'm divided between white chocolate with Ricotta mouse frosting and raspberry filling, or a genoise cake with vanilla buttercream and a hazelnut filling. I'd have coconut cake, but I don't like temping fate by intentionally bringing about parallels between my life and ASOUE.
|
|
|
Post by BSam on Jun 7, 2012 17:20:55 GMT -5
Actually, it is relevant to other people because, after all, what use is it not taking the possibility that the God of the bible, the same God I talk of, into account? What makes one think it's not relevant to them? Because they say so? Most people don't believe in God. Doesn't mean he doesn't exist. Why? Because existence isn't based out of our belief. I feel it is relevant because, what if, after all, he does exist? Alright, I'll assume religion is true for this conversation. There are a handful which welcome homosexuality and all forms of sexuality, (from a quick glance at wikipedia I can name at least two, Neopaganism and LaVey Satanism. I'll use one of them.) Most people don't believe in Neopaganism. Doesn't mean it doesn't exist. Why? Because existence isn't based out of our belief. I feel it is relevant because, what if, after all, it does exist? What are you going to do when you find that indeed it does exist and its deities told you, "Homosexuality is alright you know, but antagonising an entire culture of people isn't."? You should not deny the possibility that what I'm saying is mostly correct just because it doesn't please you. Believe what you want, homosexuality is not and should not be a religious argument. I apologise if it feels like we ganged up on you a bit here, but you really need a better argument if you're attacking other peoples sexuality. Religion can be a great tool for working out your own issues with sexuality and life in general, but it turns into a weapon when used against others.
|
|
|
Post by Kobolos on Jun 7, 2012 17:34:03 GMT -5
I believe we were talking about Lesbians here, can we stay on topic?
|
|
|
Post by soufflé on Jun 7, 2012 17:57:59 GMT -5
a genoise cake with vanilla buttercream and a hazelnut filling I think this one sounds best. Mmmm Your wedding's going to be amazing, LadyG. I'm excited. When do you think it'll be?
|
|