|
|
Post by SnicketFires on Jan 12, 2005 22:15:15 GMT -5
I just had a new wild idea. We have never seen the parents of Carmelita. Could Justice Strauss also be Mrs. Spats? Could Jermome Squalor also be Mr. Spats? Either or both might be true. What do you think? It's a meeting place between the J.S.'s. I'm leaning towards Justice being the mother rather than Jerome. |
|
|
|
Post by Jacques the Environmentalist on Jan 12, 2005 22:20:13 GMT -5
And then there's me who doesn't support either.
|
|
LiamSnicket
Bewildered Beginner
The world is noisy here.
Posts: 9
|
Post by LiamSnicket on Jan 15, 2005 21:18:19 GMT -5
everyone here has totally different ideas from everyone else. does anyone remember how when the 10th book cam out there wuz a little code thing on the official website saying somethin about intials and gettin them mixed up or something. does anyone rember that?  i dont remeber wut it said excactly. |
|
|
|
Post by darkangel667 on Jan 15, 2005 21:35:44 GMT -5
i think it said something along the lines of ' the same intials can cause some injustice'
|
|
|
|
Post by SnicketFires on Jan 15, 2005 22:50:42 GMT -5
Many individuals have the same initials which can lead to much injustice.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jacques the Environmentalist on Jan 15, 2005 22:54:04 GMT -5
Yes. So perhaps there are more JSes and they are being confused with the true JS and betrayal and spying and such is occurring due to the confusion of which JS is which.
|
|
|
|
Post by Dante on Jan 16, 2005 4:59:22 GMT -5
Yes. So perhaps there are more JSes and they are being confused with the true JS and betrayal and spying and such is occurring due to the confusion of which JS is which. Exactly. Intriguingly, the "many individuals" clue was supposed to be a clue to the plot of TGG, yet it didn't end up playing much of a role. ...Or did it? |
|
|
|
Post by c45 on Jan 16, 2005 11:58:07 GMT -5
Would someone sending a telegram to Justice Strauss actually send it to J.S.? Her first name could be anything, for all we know. It just seems a weird way to address someone (JS) if it's only their official title that starts with 'J'.
|
|
|
|
Post by darkangel667 on Jan 16, 2005 12:35:35 GMT -5
If she was part of the V.F.D. wouldn't they send it by her first true initial?
|
|
|
|
Post by Jacques the Environmentalist on Jan 16, 2005 21:42:39 GMT -5
If she was part of the V.F.D. wouldn't they send it by her first true initial? Yes but this is a very mysterious topic and there is more than one J in VFD so they may wish to be a bit more specific. Or maybe this person (or people) wish(es) to go by J.S. for reasons unknown. |
|
|
|
Post by SnicketFires on Jan 16, 2005 22:13:09 GMT -5
Exactly. Intriguingly, the "many individuals" clue was supposed to be a clue to the plot of TGG, yet it didn't end up playing much of a role. ...Or did it? I was wondering that also. The Slippery Slope clue (where two will leave and never be seen again) played into TSS, but there was only the one mention of JS, really, in TGG. |
|
|
|
Post by Jacques the Environmentalist on Jan 16, 2005 22:51:31 GMT -5
or 3. There was etartsigam, Quigley's copied message, and poe's message.
|
|
|
|
Post by Keya on Jan 17, 2005 9:46:21 GMT -5
Could it be possible that the JS who Quigley trusted never got the telegram? Someone else could've gotten it and sent it to Poe.
|
|
|
|
Post by Dante on Jan 17, 2005 11:42:31 GMT -5
or 3. There was etartsigam, Quigley's copied message, and poe's message. Yes, but only Poe's message seemed to tie into the concept of there being multiple J.S.s, and that this might be troublesome. |
|
|
|
Post by Jacques the Environmentalist on Jan 17, 2005 22:25:16 GMT -5
Yes, but only Poe's message seemed to tie into the concept of there being multiple J.S.s, and that this might be troublesome. It may, I was just at that time counting the JS references in tgg, not speculating. |
|
i dont remeber wut it said excactly.
