|
|
Post by PJ on Jun 8, 2005 2:15:33 GMT -5
I'm on your side, if you but knew it. I'm mocking jwhateversebald's posts. Now I have to explain my witticisms, they aren't funny any more. I think I might join BSam and turn to alcoholism... Don't worry, Ennui, Jacques will get whats coming towards him. MWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. |
|
|
|
Post by Ennui on Jun 8, 2005 2:38:21 GMT -5
In the world of Star Wars, perhaps?
Anyway...ah...JS. Who do we imagine sent Poe? I'm generally for Justice Strauss on this one, I suppose, boring though it is.
|
|
|
|
Post by PJ on Jun 8, 2005 2:41:22 GMT -5
In the world of Star Wars, perhaps? Anyway...ah...JS. Who do we imagine sent Poe? I'm generally for Justice Strauss on this one, I suppose, boring though it is. Precisely, my sly friend. And I still favour Julio Sham. |
|
|
|
Post by Ennui on Jun 8, 2005 2:52:16 GMT -5
Julio Sham for the message in the jam jar, quite. But the JS who sent Mr Poe seems to be a different entity.
|
|
|
|
Post by PJ on Jun 8, 2005 3:07:19 GMT -5
Julio Sham for the message in the jam jar, quite. But the JS who sent Mr Poe seems to be a different entity. Hmm. What if there are three JSs? One in the jam, another who was informed about the Baudelaires, and a third who sent Mr. Poe. The first two could be the same, but the Mr. Poe one is probably evil. |
|
|
|
Post by Ennui on Jun 8, 2005 3:34:05 GMT -5
Or laissez-faire. Particularly as Poe, Justice Strauss and Jerome Squaor are all listed as laissez-faire in the LSUA index.
|
|
|
|
Post by PJ on Jun 8, 2005 3:45:22 GMT -5
Or laissez-faire. Particularly as Poe, Justice Strauss and Jerome Squaor are all listed as laissez-faire in the LSUA index. Are they? That's very interesting. That only leaves Julio, eh? |
|
|
|
Post by Dante on Jun 8, 2005 3:47:57 GMT -5
Jam jar J.S. is the same one, in my opinion, who Quigley meant to copy his telegram to. Unfortunately, it got sent to the Poe-sending J.S. instead.
I'd rather not speculate on who is who, but I think we'll be seeing the return of a number of J.S.s, some of whom will serve as red herrings.
I'm sure that I used to have theories on which J.S. was which character, though. Oh well. I think that one of the "real" J.S.s is Justice Strauss, and Jerome Squalor will be a red herring.
|
|
|
|
Post by hookhandedgirl on Jun 8, 2005 10:29:21 GMT -5
jaeques was a man not a woman.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sugary Snicket on Jul 12, 2005 13:23:33 GMT -5
I doubt it was Julio Sham, that was Olaf, remember? I'm thinking that it's Justice Strauss, because why would the good side of the schism send a message to someone on the bad side?
|
|
|
|
Post by Dante on Jul 12, 2005 13:29:26 GMT -5
I doubt it was Julio Sham, that was Olaf, remember? The theory in favour of Julio Sham is that Olaf was impersonating an actual person. This theory is based on discredited information in the U.A. index, and the fact that a J. disguised himself as "Captain S.," again in the U.A. (although not in the index). |
|
|
|
Post by ashleyadres on Jul 12, 2005 20:14:38 GMT -5
J.S. obviously stands for Jerome Squalor! If you read the unauthorized biography you will see that Jaques Snicket and Jerome Squalor sent letters back and forth so he was involved in VFD. Jerome is also the only one of the Baudelaires guardians who is not evil or dead.
|
|
Orphan
Reptile Researcher
Posts: 25
|
Post by Orphan on Jul 13, 2005 12:54:04 GMT -5
I believe it is Justice Strauss, and unless anyone has evidence to prove me wrong entirely, I'll continue to believe that J. S. is Justice Strauss.
|
|
cj
Reptile Researcher
Posts: 35
|
Post by cj on Jul 14, 2005 21:16:56 GMT -5
Guys i have a theory, what if J.S is 2 people i mean all
volunteers use the first letter of ther first name right?
|
|
|
|
Post by MsMourning on Jul 14, 2005 21:26:12 GMT -5
Why do you end everything in a question mark? I think it is Justice Strauus. Maybe because it's a question. |
|
